Live
- DEO suspends teacher accused of sexual assault
- PM ‘cursing’ Congress out of despair: Maharashtra Cong Chief
- Applications are invited for Junior Colleges Scheme District Scheduled Castes Development Officer Ramlal
- A nomination was filed on the second day for the Nagar Kurnool parliamentary seat
- SP Gaikwad inspected the Telangana Amarnath Saleswaram Jatara yatra arrangements
- Rahul Gandhi's decision to contest from Wayanad shows 'lack of confidence': BJP President Nadda
- IPL 2024: Delhi bowlers will go after all of SRH’s top-order batters, says head coach Ricky Ponting
- At Amroha rally, PM Modi sends out ‘meaningful’ message for Muslims and Hindus
- Tripura records highest 79.83 pc voter turnout in Northeast
- The government has to clear the confusion
FCAT passing 'An Insignificant Man' a bittersweet victory: Dir
The FCAT has ordered the censor board to grant a U/A certificate to \"An Insignificant Man\", a documentary on the making of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). The directors, Khushboo Ranka and Vinay Shukla decided to move to the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal
Mumbai: The FCAT has ordered the censor board to grant a U/A certificate to "An Insignificant Man", a documentary on the making of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). The directors, Khushboo Ranka and Vinay Shukla decided to move to the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT) after facing issues at the examining and revising committees of the board. The directors were apparently asked to bring NoCs (No Objection Certificates) from political leaders mentioned in the story.
"This is a bittersweet victory for us. While we have got the judgement in our favour, it has taken a long time, lot of efforts and resources. I think Mr (Pahlaj) Nihalani's tenure was controversial due to the kind of decisions he made," Ranka told PTI. The filmmakers wanted the film to release in February this year, something that could not be possible due to certification issues with the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). The documentary has been granted a go-ahead just days after the appointment of adman-lyricist Prasoon Joshi as the new chairman of the board. Asked whether Nihalani's ouster was a good sign, the director said, "Hopefully, this board will be better and more progressive. But it remains to be seen.
It is too early to say anything." The FCAT held that the requirement of seeking an NoC from political personages and others as a pre-condition for certification of the documentary is wholly unsustainable and not permissible by law, Ranka said. She said former CBFC chairman was overreaching when he gave conservative judgements that had no legal basis or were not based on the Cinematography Act.
"The FCAT has overturned a lot of judgements of the CBFC while it was headed by Pahlaj Nihalani... it says a lot." When asked whether filmmakers were using the board's decision for publicity, as Nihalani often claimed, Ranka said the same can be applied to him. "He used to make arbitrary cuts in films so that he could be in news. Whatever decisions he made were overturned by a higher legal body, which means he was propagating arbitrary things. If he didn't want to be in the news, he should have stuck to the rulebook."
