- JoJo Siwa says she was shocked to be attracted to Chris Hughes
- Odisha’s three-day UAE outreach attracts Rs 2.43 lakh crore investment proposals
- US envoy hails PM Modi’s focus on Northeast development, invites attention to Manipur tourism
- South Asian nations vow coordinated action against wildlife crime
- Drug-free MSRTC campaign launched to ensure driver and passenger safety
- 6.1 lakh people utilise loans given by Safai Karamcharis' finance corporation
- At 9/11 tribute, Trump vows to deny Iran nukes
- Global rights groups raise concern over rapidly deteriorating press freedom in Pakistan
When skilled immigrants are overqualified, employers pay a price too
In Short
Discover why nearly one in three skilled immigrants in Canada face overqualification, the impact on employers, and how workplace autonomy and career paths help retain talent.
Share :
When skilled immigrants are overqualified, employers pay a price too
Canada actively recruits highly educated and skilled immigrants through programmes, yet many of these immigrants struggle to find work matching their skills and experience. Nearly one in three immigrants with a post-secondary education report that they are overqualified for their jobs. Statistics from 2024 and 2025 puts the figure at 33 per cent, compared with 19 per cent among local workers. Much of the discourse around this issue has focused, understandably, on why skilled immigrants end up in jobs below their qualifications.
There are critical issues, and efforts to address them must continue. But less attention has been paid to why this mismatch is not only a problem for employees, but also for employers, and what the latter can do when an overqualified immigrant is already on the job.
When overqualification goes unaddressed:
Research in Germany found that immigrants who strongly identified with their host country experienced the sharpest drops in job satisfaction when they felt overqualified. For these workers, the mismatch may feel like a form of rejection or devaluation within their new society.
Why employers should care:
The consequences can also extend to employers. Research on overqualified employees suggests their frustration with their jobs can reduce their willingness to go beyond their basic duties to help colleagues or contribute to the organisation. This might include mentoring colleagues, volunteering for extra projects or suggesting ways to improve the organisation.
There is also the risk of losing the employee altogether. Research suggests that overqualification can create both a sense of task mastery and a sense of relative deprivation at the same time. At the same time, they may feel frustrated that their qualifications and experience are not being fully used.
What employers can do:
Research suggests that employers can soften some of the negative effects of overqualification, such as lower job satisfaction and intentions to leave, by giving overqualified employees greater autonomy, opportunities to use their skills and a realistic path for advancement. One study found that overqualified employees with little control over their work were more likely to withdraw or consider leaving. Greater autonomy gave them room to engage in “job crafting”.
A 2026 study found that overqualified employees responded more positively when they saw suitable opportunities for career advancement within their organisation. Managers cannot fix the broader systemic causes of immigrant overqualification like credential recognition, licensing requirements and wider labour-market barriers.
But they can influence what happens once an overqualified immigrant is on the job. Managing that mismatch well can help employers retain skilled workers while giving employees a greater opportunity to use the expertise they brought with them.
(The writers are from University of Victoria (Canada)
