Congress targets EC over refusal to disclose ECINET details
In Short
Congress accuses the Election Commission of concealing ECINET software details and AI use in electoral roll revisions under RTI, alleging centralized manipulation.
Share :
Congress targets EC over refusal to disclose ECINET details
New Delhi: The Congress on Sunday accused the Election Commission of withholding details about ECINET software used in electoral roll revision. The dispute has intensified concerns over transparency, artificial intelligence safeguards and institutional accountability.
The party alleged that the information was being withheld because it would reveal what it called “massive, centralised manipulation” during the exercise. It also reiterated its demand for the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and the immediate suspension of the SIR.
Congress general secretary in charge of communications Jairam Ramesh shared a media report claiming that the Election Commission of India had declined to disclose the name and version of the software used to identify errors and anomalies in voter rolls during the SIR.
A yellow alert has been issued for Komaram Bheem Asifabad, Mancherial, Peddapalli, Karimnagar, Hanumakonda, Jangaon and Yadadri Bhuvanagiri districts, where heavy rainfall is likely at isolated places.
According to the report, the poll body said the information concerned “commercial confidence, trade secrets and intellectual property” and was exempt from disclosure under the Right to Information Act.
In a post on X, Ramesh alleged that the Election Commission continued to “hide” information about the ECINET software, which he claimed was at the “heart of the disastrous SIR” and had been used to centralise the manipulation of electoral rolls.
“Today, a leading national daily revealed that the ECI has refused to provide information on the software being used in the SIR in its response to a Right to Information (RTI) application. Using flimsy excuses, the ECI has refused to name the software being used in the SIR, or confirm whether AI is being used and what safeguards are in place,” Ramesh said.
He said the lack of transparency surrounding the ECINET software and the use of artificial intelligence had damaged citizens’ confidence in the entire process.
Ramesh alleged that the Election Commission was repeatedly refusing to provide the information because it would reveal the extent of what he described as massive and centralised manipulation. He asked why Indians had learnt through disclosures by Tata Consultancy Services that the company had developed the ECINET software, and why the Election Commission had not disclosed this transparently.
He also questioned why the poll body had repeatedly denied the use of artificial intelligence in the SIR and electoral roll revision when, according to him, it was being used.
