Don't Destroy Traders' Livelihoods for Political Gains: Live and Let Live

In Short

The traders' body said it would await a response from Gandhi. However, it added that immediately after Diwali, business leaders from across the country would convene in Delhi for a crucial national meeting to decide their future course of action.

Dont Destroy Traders Livelihoods for Political Gains: Live and Let Live
X

Don't Destroy Traders' Livelihoods for Political Gains: Live and Let Live

Font size
FOLLOW ON Google News

The opposition rally at Ramlila Maidan was over on November 1, but the distress caused to traders does not seem to have ended. The Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), peeved that opposition parties refused to postpone their rally until after Diwali, has now written to Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, expressing the deep resentment and distress felt by traders across the country over the frequent disruption of business activities in Delhi caused by political rallies, sit-ins and protests over the past month.

The traders' body said it would await a response from Gandhi. However, it added that immediately after Diwali, business leaders from across the country would convene in Delhi for a crucial national meeting to decide their future course of action.

In its letter, CAIT raised serious questions about the rally organised by the Congress and other opposition parties at Ramlila Maidan.

The traders said, "This is no longer an issue confined solely to the traders of Delhi. If such a situation can arise in the national capital today, it could just as easily occur in any other city in the country. Consequently, this has evolved into a serious national issue, and the trading community is not so weak as to continue tolerating such circumstances. The time has come to teach a lesson," CAIT said in a statement.

It further announced that traders would observe a 'Dhikkar Diwas' (Day of Condemnation) across the country, with the date to be finalised at the upcoming meeting in New Delhi.

CAIT National President B C Bhartia said demonstrations supported by the Congress and other opposition parties had severely affected economic activity in the national capital, particularly at a time when the city was witnessing a crucial festive and wedding-related shopping season. He said the Congress and other opposition parties should have recognised their moral responsibility towards the trading community.

"Mr Rahul Gandhi cannot hold two contradictory positions simultaneously. On the one hand, he urges people to shop in local markets, while on the other, he supports political events and demonstrations that prevent customers from reaching those very markets. This is not merely a political contradiction; it is a double standard that directly undermines the livelihoods of ordinary traders," Bhartia said.

Strongly objecting to what he termed the selective interpretation of constitutional rights by political leaders, Bhartia pointed out that while Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution guarantees every citizen the right to freedom of expression, Article 19(1)(g) guarantees the right to practise any profession or carry on any trade or business. The opposition had effectively deprived traders of this right, he added.

He questioned whether Rahul Gandhi believed that the right to protest took precedence over the right to conduct business and earn a livelihood.

"Is Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution merely meant for speeches and textbooks, or does it also safeguard the rights of millions of small traders, shopkeepers, street vendors and working-class families whose survival depends on their daily earnings? Political leaders cannot selectively invoke constitutional provisions to suit their convenience while disregarding the rights of others," he added.

Bhartia also asked who would compensate traders and working-class families for the massive economic losses they had suffered, with their livelihoods bearing the brunt of the disruptions.

"Is there any mechanism within the Congress party's political framework under which organisers and supporters of disruptive protests accept responsibility for the economic losses caused by their actions? Or has it become acceptable to sacrifice the livelihoods of ordinary citizens for the sake of a political show of strength? Was it politically and morally justifiable to hold the commercial life of the national capital hostage?" the CAIT president asked.

He wondered how Rahul Gandhi expected people to participate in the rally and go shopping at the same time when such protests often resulted in markets being shut down. Would Gandhi accept such a situation if his own livelihood or daily earnings were affected, Bhartia asked.

Political parties, he said, "must understand that Delhi is not merely a stage for the display of political power; it is also a vital commercial and economic hub for the country. Delhi's markets serve as the foundation for the livelihoods of millions and make a significant contribution to the national economy and government revenue."

"The nation's traders are not 'punching bags' for anyone's political struggle. They are the backbone of the domestic economy, a key driver of job creation and partners in nation-building. They are not seeking any special privileges; they merely expect their constitutional rights to be respected. Rahul Gandhi should understand that while opposing the government politically is a democratic right, destroying someone else's livelihood in the name of political opposition is neither democratic nor justifiable," he said.

A Journey of Three Decades Time passes faster than we realise. What feels like a journey that began only yesterday has today grown into more than three decades of a meaningful and fulfilling life devoted to education, journalism, and the empowerment of young minds. My professional journey began with journalism training in New Delhi in 1979. I went on to work as an independent journalist, drawing on my fluency in both English and Telugu. Over the years, I have edited and worked on Telugu articles in both languages, an experience that strengthened my command of language and sharpened my understanding of society, people, and contemporary issues. Yet, my principal profession and enduring passion have always been teaching. My decision to become a teacher was not merely a career choice—it was a calling. Teaching offered me the rare privilege of inspiring young minds, guiding them through their formative years, and making a lasting difference in their lives. I found immense satisfaction in simplifying complex concepts, nurturing curiosity, encouraging independent thought, and building confidence among students. Every moment in the classroom—every question, every moment of discovery, and every spark of understanding—reminded me why I had chosen this path: to empower young people through knowledge, values, and essential life skills. My teaching career began at the grassroots level as a Montessori teacher and gradually progressed to the position of Vice Principal. I had the opportunity to work in reputed educational institutions, including Dilsukhnagar Public School in Hyderabad, where I shouldered both teaching and administrative responsibilities. Although I have always considered myself, at heart, a teacher, my administrative experience enabled me to understand and contribute to the education system from a much broader perspective. For my students, I have always tried to be an approachable and dependable presence—someone they could turn to not only for academic support, but also for guidance and emotional encouragement. At the same time, I developed a reputation as a firm disciplinarian who believed that integrity, fairness, responsibility, and discipline were fundamental to education. I was also consistently appreciated for maintaining clear communication with parents and staff and for ensuring that examinations and other academic processes were conducted with transparency, fairness, and efficiency. As my career progressed, however, I began to feel that academic education alone was not enough. This realization led me to work more closely with students following the SSC and CBSE curricula, while consciously bringing life-skills education into my teaching. I came to understand that education becomes truly meaningful when it prepares children not merely to pass examinations, but to face life. Teaching emotional resilience, self-reliance, social awareness, communication, decision-making, and other practical life skills often had a deeper and more lasting impact than academic achievement alone. I saw how these skills could help students navigate challenges with greater confidence, maturity, and responsibility. My academic background provided a strong foundation for this approach. My degree in Psychology from the University of Madras helped me develop a deeper understanding of young people's minds, their emotional needs, and the influence of their family and social environments. My M.A. in Telugu with First Class from Osmania University.

Next Story
      Share it