The upcoming Malayalam film 'Janaki vs State of Kerala', featuring Union Minister and actor Suresh Gopi alongside Anupama Parameswaran, faces an unexpected roadblock as the Central Board of Film Certification has raised objections to its title on religious grounds.

The controversy emerged when the CBFC demanded that filmmakers alter the movie's title, specifically objecting to the use of 'Janaki' due to its religious significance as another name for the Hindu goddess Sita. This directive has effectively put the film's scheduled June 27 release date in jeopardy, creating uncertainty for distributors and audiences alike.

The film's narrative centers around a woman who becomes a survivor of sexual assault and subsequently engages in a determined legal battle against the state system. This powerful storyline addressing women's rights and judicial accountability was set to reach theaters this week before the censorship intervention.

According to the production team, an interesting jurisdictional conflict has emerged within the CBFC itself. While the Thiruvananthapuram regional office cleared the film for release without any title modifications, the Mumbai headquarters has insisted on the name change, creating administrative confusion and delaying the certification process.

This development has triggered strong reactions from Kerala's film industry, with various filmmaker associations and industry bodies expressing their displeasure over what they perceive as unnecessary interference. Several prominent figures in Malayalam cinema have criticized the decision and warned of potential protest actions if the demand is not reconsidered.

The controversy highlights ongoing tensions between creative expression and religious sensitivities in Indian cinema. Filmmakers argue that 'Janaki' is a common name used across Indian culture and literature, not exclusively reserved for religious contexts. They contend that the character in question represents an ordinary woman fighting for justice, making the title appropriate for the narrative.

Industry observers note that this incident reflects broader challenges facing Indian cinema regarding censorship policies and their implementation across different regional offices. The inconsistency between local and central CBFC decisions has raised questions about standardized guidelines and the need for clearer protocols.

The film's producers are now caught between maintaining their artistic vision and meeting commercial release deadlines. Any significant delay could impact the movie's box office prospects and distribution arrangements that have already been finalized with theater chains across Kerala and other states.

As the standoff continues, the Malayalam film industry watches closely, viewing this as a test case for creative freedom and the extent of censorship powers. The resolution of this dispute may set important precedents for future films dealing with sensitive themes or utilizing names with cultural significance.