Live
- Uddhav Thackeray to PM Modi: Pay attention to Bangladesh, act to end Hindus’ misery
- Allu Arjun Arrested: KTR Reacts on X, Calls Arrest Unfair
- Bold steps by Modi govt in reviving Indian heritage, culture: Union Minister
- What are the charges against Allu Arjun: Understanding the Charges Against Him
- Allu Arjun Objects to Arrest Procedure, Requests Breakfast and Change of Clothes
- ‘Fear’ movie review: A gripping suspense thriller
- Phenom Successfully Hosts IAMPHENOM India, Transforming the Future of Work with AI, Automation, and Talent Experience
- Constitution provides shied, guarantee to Indians: Priyanka in LS
- Allu Arjun’s Quash Petition Hearing at 2:30 PM; Chiranjeevi Visits Police Station
- Bommai hails 'One Nation, One Election' move as PM Modi’s bold decision
'Spreading obscenity': Supreme Court chides Kerala activist over semi-nude photo
Kerala activist Rehana Fathima
Kerala activist Rehana Fathima's request for protection from arrest over a controversial video of her children painting on her semi-nude body was rejected by the Supreme Court today
New Delhi: Kerala activist Rehana Fathima's request for protection from arrest over a controversial video of her children painting on her semi-nude body was rejected by the Supreme Court today.
Calling it an act of "spreading obscenity", the Supreme Court said: "Why do you do all this? You might be an activist (but) what kind of nonsense is this? It is obscenity you are spreading. It will leave a very bad taste in society".
The three-member bench led by Justice Arun Mishra also questioned: "What impression will growing children get from this act?"
Rehana Fatima was charged with under the POCSO (Protection Of Children from Sexual Offences) and IT (Information Technology) Act after a video emerged of her minor children - a 14-year-old-boy and eight-year-old girl painting on her semi-nude body.
In her plea Ms Fathima said she had "intended to normalise the female form for her children and not allow distorted ideas of sexualisation to pervade their minds".
The activist, who made headlines for an attempt to enter Sabrimala temple in September 2018 (after the Supreme Court allowed women from traditionally-barred age groups of 10-50 to enter), approached the Supreme Court after the Kerala High Court denied her anticipatory bail.
She had argued that the case against her violated her fundamental rights to life, liberty and dignity. In the petition filed before the top court on Monday, she also pointed out that she had fully co-operated in the investigation and her conduct had been exceptional.
"Goddesses in Kerala are frequently depicted in idols and murals with bare breasts. When one prays at the temple the feeling is not of sexual arousal but one of divinity," Ms Fathima, in her plea before the top court, had said.
"(Does) female nudity (even when not visible) per se constitutes obscenity? (Can) children painting on their mother's body can be concluded to be "sexual gratification" and "child abuse" under these stringent laws?" she asked.
