An avoidable tragedy

Highlights

That at least 37 persons have perished in a train accident in a small town of Bihar will shock the nation. But such shock should not prevent it from looking at some aspects of the tragedy which suggest that it could have been avoided with a little care from both the passengers and the railway staff at the Dhamara railway station in Khagaria district. Whenever a train accident occurs, no matter where in India, the common tendency both among masses and the media is to recall how Lal Bahadur Shastri had resigned as Railway Minister owning moral responsibility for the train accident deep down South India.

That at least 37 persons have perished in a train accident in a small town of Bihar will shock the nation. But such shock should not prevent it from looking at some aspects of the tragedy which suggest that it could have been avoided with a little care from both the passengers and the railway staff at the Dhamara railway station in Khagaria district. Whenever a train accident occurs, no matter where in India, the common tendency both among masses and the media is to recall how Lal Bahadur Shastri had resigned as Railway Minister owning moral responsibility for the train accident deep down South India.

That tendency is natural because Shastri had thereby set a precedent for the conduct of a railway minister following a train mishap. But resignation by the railway minister is not a substitute for provision of such facilities at railway stations as would avert accidents. For instance, in the present case, pilgrims were trying to cross tracks after alighting from another train when they were crushed by the speeding Rajya Rani Express which was on its way to Patna from Saharsa and which did not have a scheduled halt at Dhamara station.

According to video grabs of the station, people have no access to the train they mean to board, other than walking up to it; there is no elevated platform from which they could enter or get out of a train; they have necessarily to cross railway tracks to get to their train. The pilgrims were doing precisely that when they were crushed by the Express train. Therefore, the railway authorities need to explain why they did not provide such a basic facility at the station, and also why they did not tell the pilgrims crossing a railway track of the danger they were thereby courting.

Precious lives could have been saved if authorities had done either. It was only natural that the rest of the pilgrims should have been outraged by the tragedy, but that sense of outrage need not have been exhibited by torching six coaches of the train. Additionally, with the assistance of “locals” they beat up the drivers of the two trains; one of them is dead and the other is reported to be in a critical condition.
Was such a violent reaction necessary? While torching coaches, how did they forget that there were passengers in other compartments and that they might be endangered? If that was not the handiwork only of the irate pilgrims and if lumpen elements, always on the lookout for an opportunity to create disorder, had taken over from them, what were the law and order authorities of the Bihar government doing while the coaches burned and two train drivers were mauled? Therefore, the conclusion is inevitable that all parties (railway authorities, State government authorities, Railway protection force, and pilgrims) compounded the tragedy.
Of course, an inquiry will be ordered into the factors that led to this accident, as it is ordered after every accident, and then the whole incident will be forgotten along with the inquiry report, and it will be business as usual. The solution, therefore, lies in the railway authorities providing basic facilities for passengers, especially at such remote stations, so that there may be no stampede when a train steams onto the platform and passengers may not have to cross railway tracks in droves to approach their train.
Show Full Article
Print Article
Next Story
More Stories
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENTS