Live
- Upendra’s ‘UI: The Movie’ clears censor; Set for Dec 20 release
- Official: Balakrishna’s ‘Akhanda 2’ locks release date
- Indian Researchers Uncover Key Insights into the Sun's Corona with Aditya-L1
- Brunei sultan urges united efforts from energy companies to face future challenges
- Student Ends Life After Being Scolded by Parents
- Telecom operators geared up to block spammy telemarketer messages from Wednesday
- Mohan Babu should immediately issue a public apology: Press Club President Balavardhan
- Strict Protocols Set for Group 2 Exams in Wanaparthy District
- Delhi Police busts gang involved in cable theft on Delhi Metro Blue Line
- MP's Gita recitation programme finds place in Guinness World Records
Supreme Court dismisses gay sex review plea
SC dismisses gay sex review plea, Supreme Court, Gay sex, H L Dattu and S J Mukhopadhaya. The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to relook into its verdict criminalising gay sex in the country.
- Section 377 thatcriminalizes gay sex stands
- On Dec 11, SC had set aside a Delhi HC order
- It asked Parliament to amend the law
- Centre filed a review petition seeking relook
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to relook into its verdict criminalising gay sex in the country.
A Bench of Justices H L Dattu and S J Mukhopadhaya, dismissed a bunch of petitions filed by the Centre and gay rights activists against its December 2013 verdict declaring gay sex an offence punishable up to life imprisonment.
In a big setback to the LGBT community, the Supreme Court had on December 11 set aside the Delhi High Court judgement decriminalising gay sex and thrown the ball into Parliament’s court for amending the law.
The judgement revived the penal provision making gay sex an offence punishable with life imprisonment in a setback to people fighting a battle for recognition of their sexual preferences. Seeking a stay on the operation of the judgement, gay rights activists, including NGO Naz Foundation, had said thousands from the LGBT community became open about their sexual identity during the past four years after the high court decriminalised gay sex and they are now facing the threat of being prosecuted.
They had submitted that criminalising gay sex amounts to violation of fundamental rights of the LGBT community. “This court has failed to consider the submission that Section 377 violates the right to health of men who have sex with men, since criminalisation of same sex activity impedes access to health services, including HIV prevention efforts. This contention was supported by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare in this court,” the review petition had said.
Amid huge outrage against the judgement, the Centre had also filed a review petition in the apex court seeking a relook to “avoid grave miscarriage of justice to thousands of LGBT” persons who have been aggrieved by the apex court judgement contending it is “unsustainable” as it “suffers from errors”. While setting aside the July 2, 2009 judgement of the Delhi High Court, the apex court had held that Section 377 (unnatural sexual offences) of the IPC does not suffer from the vice of unconstitutionality and that the declaration made by the high court is legally unsustainable.
