Live
- People want to see Jagan as CM once again
- Vasantha Krishna Prasad has movable assets of Rs 81.18 cr
- APCC working president Padmasree not to contest polls
- Hyderabad: Man arrested for matrimonial frauds
- Naidu vows equal importance to women in legislative bodies
- Change of nominee buoys TDP in Venkatagiri
- Major blaze erupts at pre-owned car showroom, 20 vehicles gutted
- 11 medical facilities pay Rs 5.11 cr in property tax
- BJP to intensify campaign in state
- Poll panel intensifies vigil through CCC
Money laundering case : Court extends interim protection to Arora
A Delhi court on Saturday extended till February 6 the interim protection from arrest granted to Manoj Arora, a close aide of UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhis soninlaw Robert Vadra, in a money laundering case
New Delhi: A Delhi court on Saturday extended till February 6 the interim protection from arrest granted to Manoj Arora, a close aide of UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi's son-in-law Robert Vadra, in a money laundering case.
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) told Special Judge Arvind Kumar that Arora was cooperating in the probe. “He joined the probe on Friday. So far, he has been cooperating,” Special Public Prosecutor D P Singh, appearing for the ED, said.
ED's Special Public Prosecutor Nitesh Rana sought two more weeks for arguments on the application which was allowed by the court. Rana said it remained to be seen if Arora would cooperate further.
In the last hearing, Arora had alleged before the court that the case was foisted on him by the NDA government out of “political vendetta”.
However, the ED refuted the allegations, asking that “should no authority investigate any political bigwig because that will be called a political vendetta?”
The agency had told the court that it lodged the money laundering case against Arora after his role came up during the probe of another case by the Income Tax Department under the newly-enacted Black Money Act and Imposition of Tax act, 2015, against absconding arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari.
It said the London-based property was bought by Bhandari for GBP 1.9 million and sold in 2010 for the same amount despite incurring additional expenses of approximately GBP 65,900 on its renovation.
“This gives credence to the fact that Bhandari was not the actual owner of the property, but it was beneficially owned by Vadra who was incurring expenditure on the renovation of this property,” the ED had told court.
Arora, an employee of Vadra's Skylight Hospitality LLP, was a key person in the case and he was aware of the latter's overseas undeclared assets and was instrumental in arranging funds, it had said.
