Live
- BJP leaders present evidence of illegal voters in Delhi, urge EC for swift action
- Exams will not be cancelled: BPSC chairman
- Nagesh Trophy: Karnataka, T.N win in Group A; Bihar, Rajasthan triumph in Group B
- Economic and digital corridors to maritime connectivity, India and Italy building vision for future, says Italian Ambassador
- SMAT 2024: Patidar's heroics guide Madhya Pradesh to final after 13 years
- CCPA issues notices to 17 entities for violating direct selling rules
- Mamata expresses satisfaction over speedy conviction in minor girl rape-murder case
- Transparent Survey Process for Indiramma Housing Scheme Directed by District Collector
- District SP T Srinivas Rao, IPS, Conducts Annual Inspection at Dharur Police Station
- Job Fair for Pharmacy Retail Store Opportunities in Dharur and Hyderabad
China disturbing peaceful Tibet
The report speaks about a dozen monasteries, belonging to the Drukpa Kagyud lineage of Tibetan Buddhism being taken over by monks “with strong financial backing”, implying the ‘backing’ from China.
Last week, a strange piece of news appeared in The Economic Times (ET), “While transgressions by Chinese soldiers in Ladakh in September and the resultant standoff were widely reported, an incursion of another kind shrouded in mystery is said to have taken place in Tibet at around the same time.”
The report speaks about a dozen monasteries, belonging to the Drukpa Kagyud lineage of Tibetan Buddhism being taken over by monks “with strong financial backing”, implying the ‘backing’ from China.
It is true that for centuries there has been infighting over supremacy of the richly-endowed monasteries amongst sects and sub-sects of Tibetan Buddhism. But what is strange this time is that the 12th Gyalwang Drukpa Rinpoche, the spiritual head of the Drukpa Kagyud lineage, has linked the takeover of his monasteries in Tibet with the PLA’s transgressions in Chumar and elsewhere in Ladakh.
Why to link the two events is not clear, except perhaps to get publicity and force the Indian intelligence agencies to look into the issue?
The Gyalwang Drukpa told the ET, “We are still trying to ascertain if more monasteries have been taken over as these areas in Tibet are remote and communication is poor. …These monks are apolitical, engaged in spiritual work and it is baffling why they were targetted.”
The ET says that there were reports of “members of the Karma Kagyu lineage of Buddhism behind the takeover,” adding that there was no confirmation of this. The Drukpa Kagyud lineage is a sub-sect of the Kagyud school of Tibetan Buddhism, one of the four major schools (the Dalai Lama belongs to the Geluk-pa lineage).
The Drukpas have a strong following in Ladakh and Western Tibet. According to the Rinpoche, it has some 267 monasteries in the region, some of them located in the vicinity of Mount Kailash. What the ET does not mention is that the Drukpa Rinpoche had already written to the Karmapa Lama, the head of the Karma Kagyud, who lives near Dharamsala in Himachal Pradesh, accusing his followers to be behind the takeovers. It is not known if the Karmapa answered this letter.
This brings the issue of the rule by incarnation’ in Tibet, which has often been unsatisfactory. This is true not only for the Dalai Lamas, the Panchen Lamas or the Karmapas at the top of the hierarchy, but also for ‘local’ hierarchs.
Historically, the first identified ‘reincarnation’ was the 2nd Karmapa Lama, Karma Pakshi (1203–1283), who succeeded Dusum Khyenpa (1110–1193), the first Karmapa.
Pakshi became the first formally recognised ‘tulku’, signalling the beginning of the Tibetan institution of ‘incarnated’ lamas. Historians believe that it went wrong when tulkus started to inherit the estate and the mundane position (and the disciples) of their previous incarnation. This led to the rise of hugely wealthy ‘transmitted’ estates.
Politically too, the rule by reincarnation does not suit a modern nation, mainly because it can be too easily manipulated. Take the example of the 10th Panchen Lama’s reincarnation. There are two contending candidates, one chosen by the Dalai Lama and one selected by Beijing (Gyaltsen Norbu). Ditto for the Karmapa lineage: there are today two or three candidates for the post of Karmapa (The Dalai Lama has accorded recognition to Urgyen Thinley Dorjee who lives in Himachal Pradesh).
Today, the Communist Party seems determined to fully play the ‘Panchen’ card against what it calls ‘the Dalai and his clique’. In March, 2013, the Chinese Government announced that the 11th Panchen Lama had been elected member of the Standing Committee of the CPPCC National Committee, China’s top political advisory body.
It is, however, true that historically the Tibetan society has often been divided; the split between the Thirteenth Dalai Lama and the Ninth Panchen Lama at the beginning of the 20th century is a case in point. The collaterals are still visible today with two Panchen Lamas.
The present Dalai Lama should perhaps tell all Tibetan Lamas that there is only one Buddha and that they should work in harmony, otherwise the Chinese are bound to use the situation to their own advantage. As for the Chinese intrusions, it will probably continue, as the Party does not believe in Karma.
By: Claude Arpi
