Rethinking food security & hunger

A recent report from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) indicates concrete progress by India in reducing hunger and malnutrition, while many experts continue to stress the unsatisfactory outcomes under GDP-driven growth. There is a need for a new approach to address the real problems that lie somewhere in between.

According to a joint survey by the UNICEF and the Union Ministry of Women and Child Development done in 2013-14, which forms the basis for the new Global Hunger Index Report for 2014, India’s proportion of underweight children declined from 45.1 percent in 2005-06 to 301.1 percent in 2013-14. In this index, the status of India has improved one notch, from what the Global Hunger Index calls ‘alarming’ to ‘serious.’

This healthier outcome was brought about, according to the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), by the expansion and higher prioritisation of programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) and better monitoring by the Supreme Court-appointed committees.

Other identified reasons include the improvement in access to health services under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), provision of more work under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) and improved delivery of cheap food grains under the Public Distribution System (PDS). Although India’s achievements are laudable, hunger and malnutrition have been persistent.

In their book An Uncertain Glory: India and Its Contradictions, Professors Amartya Sen and Jean Dreze point out that the lack of success in broad-basing development and mitigating hunger is due to lack of sufficient investment in the social sector, as in China and Brazil. Sen and Dreze note that India spends 1.2 per cent of its GDP on public health care, while China spends 2.7 per cent.

The understanding that growth can take place only at the cost of development programmes to help the poor and deprived leads to neglect of the social sector. Sen and Dreze believe, based on the set of data that they use for analysis in the book, that GDP-induced growth in itself not only fails to address socio-economic disparities, but also hinders outcomes in the field of health and nutrition. Such an understanding is also testified to by the annual reiteration of the United Nations Human Development Index and reports.

The assertions by Sen and Dreze and indeed by many other scholars, indicating the inadequate progress in health, hunger and malnutrition indices in India, throw up questions over the recent findings of the IFPRI and their latest Global Hunger Index Report. It also creates scepticism about the accuracy and completeness of statistics collected by the UNICEF and the Government of India.

However, the real reasons behind so many people in our country having to suffer persistent hunger even as the storehouses overflow with food grains is something that scholarly theorising has not been able to pin-point…Better-defined concepts and goals of development have to be formulated to set significant priorities, based on the real needs of the poor and the deprived.

For example, Bangladesh and Nepal conduct health surveys every three years, but India has carried out a health survey only after ten years, which is a worrying practice. The other problem is that the data collected are not comprehensive and do not reflect the true situation. The Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) developed by the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, which is being used in some countries such as Bhutan, needs to be adopted in India too.

Instead of placing a narrow focus on calorie intake, consumption, income and even social and caste surveys, it may be more useful to consider more innovative ways of measuring poverty and tackling its many dimensions based on that. This is what measures such as the MPI do, reflecting the collective distribution of acute deprivations people experience at the same time.

The MPI evaluates deprivations in health, education and standard of living in the same time frame, using indicators such as malnutrition, child mortality, educated family members, incidence of school dropouts, access to of electricity, drinking water, proper sanitation, cooking fuel, adequate flooring etc.

The inability to prioritise and factor in these critical dimensions is a worrying trend that needs to be pondered upon carefully. (The writer is the Director of the Alternative Development and Research Center, Jaipur and has authored several books on social progress and development. Courtesy: http:// indiatogether.org/)

By Prahlad Shekhawat