Live
- Young Kabaddi Player Dies of Heart Attack During Match in Mandya
- Exciting Return of Santosh Trophy Football Tournament Kicks Off in Hyderabad
- Head Constable Dies by Suicide, Cites harssament by wife and inlaws
- Delhi BJP claims AAP govt will never pay women allowance like in Punjab
- India is 'Mother of Democracy': PM Modi
- ‘One nation, one election’ will undermine India’s federal structure: Mehbooba Mufti
- Vikram collaborates with director Madon Ashwin for ‘Chiyaan63’
- ‘Bachhala Malli’ trailer heightens anticipation
- Karnataka quota row: Backward Class forum chief warns Lingayat seer over 'tinkering with reservations'
- Tight security arrangements at Group-II examination centers District SP
Illegal mining: DK Arunas daughters case adjourned
A two-judge Bench of the High Court at Hyderabad comprising Justice Dilip Bhosale and Justice A Ramalingeswara Rao on Wednesday voiced displeasure over the attitude of the officials in not implementing the court orders. The Bench was dealing with a petition filed by Krishna Mohan Reddy of Gadwal. The petitioner complained that DK Snigdha, daughter of Former Minister DK Aruna
.jpg)
A two-judge Bench of the High Court at Hyderabad comprising Justice Dilip Bhosale and Justice A Ramalingeswara Rao on Wednesday voiced displeasure over the attitude of the officials in not implementing the court orders. The Bench was dealing with a petition filed by Krishna Mohan Reddy of Gadwal. The petitioner complained that DK Snigdha, daughter of Former Minister DK Aruna, encroached upon 20 acres of land though only 1 acre of land was leased to her for mining purposes at Mannapur village of Tarrur Mandal of Mahabubnagar District.
The bench had called for a report on the allegations. When the Telangana State government officials submitted that the daughter of the Former Minister had, in fact, encroached the surrounding areas for illegal mining, the Bench directed the officials to take action on the accused. On Wednesday, the Bench was informed that the officials could not take any action as a review petition filed by the accused was pending before the court. The Bench adjourned the matter by week giving time to the officials to respond to their inaction.
