Live
- Seven Japanese varsities sign MoUs with Jindal Global University
- Malavika Mohanan reveals her dream role
- Telangana CM's first reaction after Delhi summons on fake video case
- Sriramulu is doing politics of convenience: DCM D K Shivakumar
- Rainbow Children's Clinic and BirthRight Clinic Opens in Hennur, Bengaluru
- Priyadarshi to star in quirky romantic tale
- Sharvari Wagh steals spotlight with stunning appearance
- Director Malli Ankam unveils insights into Allari Naresh’s ‘Aa Okkati Adakku’
- Indian Official Accused Of Orchestrating Attack On Khalistani Terrorist In the US
- Crisis of Loyalty: Congress Leaders Defecting To BJP Sparks Concerns
States and UTs must ensure that district officers appointed under anti-sexual harassment law: Supreme Court
Supreme Court of India
The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the Women and Child Department in every state and Union Territory to ensure appointment of district officers under the anti-sexual harassment law within a period of four weeks.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the Women and Child Department in every state and Union Territory to ensure appointment of district officers under the anti-sexual harassment law within a period of four weeks.
A bench of Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta was considering a plea filed by NGO Initiatives For Inclusion Foundation, seeking directions for implementation of the provisions of the Sexual Harassment at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.
"The concerned Principal Secretary of the State/UT Ministry of Women and Child (or any other Department…, will personally ensure appointment of a district officer in each district within their territorial jurisdiction," the bench ordered.
It said that the role of the District Officer is “pivotal” in the implementation of the Act.
The POSH (Prevention of Sexual Harassment) Act mandates each employer to constitute an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) and for those workplaces which employ less than 10 workers or where the employer themselves are the respondent, the Act provides for a Local Complaints Committee in each district to be constituted by District Officer.
The Act provides that the appropriate government may notify a District Magistrate or Additional District Magistrate or the Collector or Deputy Collector as a District Officer for every District.
The Supreme Court held that the term ‘may’ not be construed as discretionary, else the efficacy of the anti-sexual harassment legislation will “fall flat”.
"District Officers were in most states notified after notice of this writ petition was served on them, and even among those states that have taken action – they have simply notified a specific post as District Officer, without providing any specific details of the officers, their contact information, etc."
The Supreme Court ordered that the matter will be listed in the first week of February 2024, for further compliance.
