- SPMVV to open space observatory for students
- Naidu hails Modi’s 25 years in public service
- AP plans Southern states conclave to step up war on drugs
- PM Modi calls for rules-based maritime order
- 'Is democracy in India being undermined like China, Russia and North Korea': Gehlot on FIR against Rahul, Priyanka Gandhi
- Delhi Seemapuri Building Collapse: Several Feared Trapped As Rescue Operation Underway
- Claude Users Can Work Across Google Docs, Sheets and Slides In-App
- Rapido Ride Turns Into Nightmare After Captain Flees With Injured Passenger
HC judge recuses from hearing Gymkhana Club eviction case
In Short
Justice Jalan directed that the lawsuit by the Delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd Staff Welfare Association be listed before another bench on Friday.

New Delhi: Delhi High Court judge Justice Prateek Jalan on Wednesday recused himself from hearing a case over the Centre’s proceedings against the Delhi Gymkhana Club for its eviction from the 27.3-acre premises on Safdarjung Road here. Justice Jalan directed that the lawsuit by the Delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd Staff Welfare Association be listed before another bench on Friday.
“I am going to recuse from this matter. There are matters where one does not trust one’s own judgement,” Justice Jalan said. “There is too much personal involved. I will feel more comfortable if someone else heard it,” he said without elaborating.
Gymkhana member Vijay Khurana and Delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd Staff Welfare Association have filed separate lawsuits against the Land and Development Office (L&DO)’s May 22 order terminating the colonial-era club’s perpetual lease deed and asking it to return its land by June 5 on grounds of “strengthening and securing defence infrastructure”.
Khurana’s lawsuit is stated to be supported by more than 500 club members. They have also filed applications seeking a stay on the June 29 show-cause notice for eviction issued to the club’s management by an estate officer of the L&DO. The Centre had earlier said it would not take any coercive action in relation to the eviction for the time being. The Centre, in its response to the main matter, has asserted that lawsuits were liable to be dismissed. It had said that third parties cannot restrain the enforcement of rights arising from the now-determined lease deed between the authorities and the club for the land parcel.
Talliki Vandanam expanded: The scheme now covers 68.06 lakh students
CM Naidu to meet Modi, seek approval of state projects
On the day marking his 25 years at the helm, PM Modi calls on LK Advani
Pixel Moments to Politics For Cong As BJP Celebrates Modi@25
Dramatic face-off near Jantar Mantar. Rahul and Priyanka sit on the road
Telangana Meets Record Power Demand, Says Bhatti Vikramarka

