Live
- Director Malli Ankam unveils insights into Allari Naresh’s ‘Aa Okkati Adakku’
- Indian Official Accused Of Orchestrating Attack On Khalistani Terrorist In the US
- Crisis of Loyalty: Congress Leaders Defecting To BJP Sparks Concerns
- Anand Devarakonda’s ‘Gam Gam Ganesha’ set to hit theaters on May 31st
- IPL 2024: With belief in process, Ravi Bishnoi remains hopeful of selection in T20 WC
- Preity Zinta misses 'Pati Parmeshwar' Gene Goodenough, drops adorable video
- Jaipur International Airport receives another hoax bomb threat
- Ultratech posts 35 per cent jump in Q4 net profit, declares dividend of Rs 70 per share
- Seven dead in attack on Russian police post in the North Caucasus
- Sony PS5 Slim Gets a Price Drop in Summer Sale: Check Offers
No order issued to stop funding for DCPCR: LG's affidavit to Delhi HC
Delhi Lieutenant Governor (LG), VK Saxena, on Thursday filed an affidavit before the Delhi High Court saying that no order was issued to halt the funding of the Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR).
New Delhi: Delhi Lieutenant Governor (LG), VK Saxena, on Thursday filed an affidavit before the Delhi High Court saying that no order was issued to halt the funding of the Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR).
Justice Subramonium Prasad is dealing with a petition by the DCPCR against the alleged freezing of its funds by state authorities.
Last time, the LG's counsel submitted that the press release mentioned in the petition, indicating the action to stop funding pending an enquiry, was never issued by the LG's office.
The affidavit also stated that no press release dated November 9, 2023, was issued or signed by the LG or his secretariat, as being claimed.
The High Court has now granted time to DCPCR to file a reply to the affidavit, and the next date of hearing is February 16.
The counsel had last time stressed on the seriousness of the matter, saying that the press release in question was not authentic.
Justice Prasad had directed the counsel to submit his statements on an affidavit.
On January 10, the High Court had asked the LG for his stance on the panel's petition, challenging the withholding of funds pending an enquiry and special audit over alleged misuse of government funds.
Justice Prasad had noted that certain portions of the press note on the action ordered by LG against the child rights body took a "political colour" and had asked the LG's counsel to seek instructions.
The press note in question mentioned that DCPCR's former Chairperson, Anurag Kundu, and six members were politically affiliated with the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and had expressed concern about the potential political motivations behind the action.
Saxena’s counsel had stated that the action was taken based on the recommendation of other state authorities and requested time to seek instructions.
Last year, Saxena approved an enquiry and special audit into the alleged misuse of funds by DCPCR, directing a halt to further fund allocation until the completion of the enquiry.
The DCPCR's senior advocate informed the court that the allocation of funds to the child rights body had stopped.
Justice Prasad had, on January 9, directed the DCPCR's counsel to serve a copy of the plea to the LG's office and inform them about the scheduled listing.
This petition was transferred from the Supreme Court, where on December 15, the apex court had instructed the DCPCR to present its grievances before the Delhi HC.
Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, representing the DCPCR, had argued in the Supreme Court that the funds of the commission should not be frozen, stressing the impact on the services provided to six million children in the city.
