- Under-construction bridge launcher crashes in Bihar, rescue efforts underway
- Viral AI 80s photo trend: How to create a retro photo with ChatGPT
- Lord Ganesha idol crafted from gold and diamonds unveiled in Hyderabad
- Will Prabhas' Fauzi Make It to Theatres This December?
- iPhone Duo Price Sparks Memes: ‘One Kidney’ Not Enough, Say Internet Users
- Ramdas Athawale Rejects Calls To Bar Muslims From Garba Events, Says India Runs On Constitution
- Ahead of UP Polls- Mayawati Drops Nephew Akash Anand
- BRICS Summit: 30,000 Security Personnel Deployed In Delhi, Xi Jinping And Putin To Stay Separately
FSSAI open to stricter food warning labels from outset, tells Supreme Court
In Short
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) had last month proposed red-coloured hexagonal warning labels for food products exceeding prescribed limits in at least two of three categories

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)
New Delhi: India’s food regulator on Thursday told the Supreme Court that it is open to introducing stricter warning labels on packaged food products from the outset, following concerns over its proposed two-phase approach to front-of-pack labelling.
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) had last month proposed red-coloured hexagonal warning labels for food products exceeding prescribed limits in at least two of three categories — added sugar, salt and saturated fat. The regulator had proposed tightening the labelling requirements in a second phase.
During Thursday’s hearing, the Supreme Court questioned FSSAI over the rationale behind adopting a two-phased approach, amid criticism from activists that the initial proposal could be too lenient and delay clear health warnings to consumers.
FSSAI informed the court that it was willing to consider implementing stricter warning labels from the beginning, including labels for products that exceed the prescribed limit for even one of the three ingredients.
The court emphasised the need to prioritise public health, particularly the health of children. “We are concerned about the health of people especially growing children,” a bench led by Justice JB Pardiwala observed.
The bench also said that all stakeholders should contribute to the issue, describing it as a matter of national interest.
The Supreme Court has asked all parties to study the order to be passed later on Thursday and submit their suggestions by September 28, when the matter is scheduled to come up for further hearing.
"We are concerned with the health of people, more particularly growing children. We have taken it up very seriously. We expect one and all to extend their cooperation to a cause which is in national interest," the Supreme Court said on Thursday.
Thai Gunman surrenders after 18hrs standoff
Banks to remain shut for four days from Sept 11- 14 dues to strike and festival
25 Years Of 9/11: Movies And Documentaries That Revisit The September 11 Attacks
'Mayawati only thinking about herself': SP on Ashok Siddharth's retirement from politics
Agentic AI Could Boost Banking Efficiency-SBI Chairman
Justice Alpesh Yeshvant Kogje sworn in as Chief Justice of MP High Court

