Live
- Ahsaas Channaopens up about her complex character in ‘Mismatched 3’
- Radhika Apte welcomes first child, shares heartfelt post
- Jacqueline dazzles at Da-Bangg Reloaded concert
- Time to boost measures to prevent drowning, save children: WHO
- TDP achieves milestone with 73 lakhs membership registration, says Chandrababu
- South Korea: Main Oppn hails Yoon's impeachment motion passage as 'victory for people, democracy'
- RG Kar issue: Tension flared over parallel protests by Congress, SUCI(C) outside CBI offices
- After furore, Central Railway revokes order to raze Lord Hanuman Temple at Dadar
- Now hoteliers' body in Bengal's Alipurduar shut doors for Bangladeshi tourists
- District Collector Encourages Students to Utilize Government Facilities for a Better Future
Delhi HC dismisses plea for transfer of matter, says grounds must be reasonable
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea seeking the transfer of matters pending before a Family Judge of Patiala House Courts to another court, saying that apprehensions leading to such requests should be reasonable and not merely a product of oversensitivity.
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea seeking the transfer of matters pending before a Family Judge of Patiala House Courts to another court, saying that apprehensions leading to such requests should be reasonable and not merely a product of oversensitivity.
Justice Navin Chawla, in rejecting the plea, noted that while it is recognised that justice must not only be done but also appear to be done, any apprehension of not receiving justice in a particular court must be founded on reason and not just an overly sensitive mindset.
The petitioner's argument, based on alleged remarks made by the Family Judge during hearings, was not deemed sufficient grounds for transfer, especially considering the petitioner's vacillating stance in prosecuting the proceedings before the Family Court.
The court referred to the Supreme Court decision in R Balakrishna Pillai vs State of Kerala, pointing out that a mere allegation of apprehension should be reasonable, genuine, and justifiable.
The court observed that the petitioner's plea was an attempt to delay the proceedings and found no valid grounds to transfer the matters to another court. The petitions were subsequently dismissed.
