Live
- Over 7,600 Syrians return from Turkiye in five days after Assad's downfall: minister
- Delhi BJP leaders stay overnight in 1,194 slum clusters
- Keerthy Suresh and Anthony Thattil Tie the Knot in a Christian Ceremony
- AAP, BJP making false promises to slum dwellers for votes: Delhi Congress
- 'Vere Level Office' Review: A Refreshing Take on Corporate Life with Humor and Heart
- Libya's oil company declares force majeure at key refinery following clashes
- Illegal Rohingyas: BJP seeks Assembly session to implement NRC in Delhi
- Philippines orders full evacuation amid possible volcanic re-eruption
- Government Prioritizes Welfare of the Poor, says Dola Sri Bala Veeranjaneyaswamy
- Two Russian oil tankers with 29 on board damaged due to bad weather
Nalgonda stands last in Inter results
In a dismal performance, Nalgonda district stood last with 43 pass percentage in the results of first year Intermediate, as against the average 55.56 pass percentage in the State. Out of the total 37,602 students appeared for the intermediate first year exams, 15, 982 students passed making the pass percentage as 43. Out of 18,827 boy students, 6,673 (35 percent) passed in the annual exams.
Nalgonda: In a dismal performance, Nalgonda district stood last with 43 pass percentage in the results of first year Intermediate, as against the average 55.56 pass percentage in the State. Out of the total 37,602 students appeared for the intermediate first year exams, 15, 982 students passed making the pass percentage as 43. Out of 18,827 boy students, 6,673 (35 percent) passed in the annual exams. Similarly, out of 18,775 girl students appeared, 9,303 (50 percent) passed in the examination.
In total, there are 169 intermediate colleges including 26 government colleges, 119 private colleges, four private aided colleges and 12 cooperative colleges in the district. In these colleges, about 24,000 students were studying science courses - BiPC and MPC. The performances of students in the intermediate results were low for many years. In the last year, the district stood third from the bottom.
The efforts of the district officials to improve the quality of education in junior colleges and improve the pass percentage had not yielded any positive result. Educationalists are attributing the poor pass percentage to the lack of infrastructure and facilities in junior colleges. A lecturer, who on condition of anonymity, said most of the a junior colleges did not even have laboratory facilities to conduct practicals to science students.
