Live
- VIP Treatment: Exclusive Benefits for High Rollers in Online Casino
- LS polls: Union Minister Bhagwanth Khuba, Dingaleshwara seer, Priyanka Jarkiholi file nominations in K'taka
- Amid show of strength, Congress’ Praniti Shinde files nomination from Solapur
- Tamil Nadu Police gives clean report to Isha Foundation in missing volunteers case
- Home Minister Amit Shah to address public meeting in Goa on April 24
- Gurgaon Open: M Dharma fires 67 for two-shot lead on penultimate day
- Sharad Pawar made many attempts to finish Shiv Sena, claims Maha minister
- Former England opener Raman Subba Row dies aged 92
- IPL 2024: Impact player rule is affecting the progress of half all-rounders, says Zaheer Khan
- ‘Teppa samudram’ review: Entertains with twists and turns
Karnataka High Court stays govt's order to drop charges against Ministers, MLAs
Karnataka High Court stays govt’s order to drop charges against Ministers, MLAs
Karnataka High Court on Monday stayed the state government's cabinet decision to drop 61 charges against its ministers and elected representatives
Bengaluru: Karnataka High Court on Monday stayed the state government's cabinet decision to drop 61 charges against its ministers and elected representatives.
"We direct that no further steps shall be taken on the basis of the order dated August 31, 2020," the division bench, headed by Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka, ordered. The court also ordered the government to file its objection by January 22, 2021.
The order was based on a petition filed by an NGO, People's Union of Civil Liberties, challenging the government decision to withdraw prosecution of 61 cases under section 321 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
During the previous hearing of the case on December 1, the High Court cited an Apex Court order.
It maintained that even if state government instructs to the public prosecutor to withdraw from the prosecution of a case, the latter after applying his mind to the facts of the case may either agree with the instructions and file a petition before the court stating grounds of withdrawal or disagree therewith having found a good case for prosecution and refuse to file the withdrawal petition.
"It is further observed that in the event the Public Prosecutor disagrees, he will have to return the brief. The Public Prosecutor cannot act like a postbox or act on the dictates of the state government and he has to act objectively as he is also an officer of the court," the court said.
It further stated that the action under section 321 of the CrPC can be taken only with the permission of the Court.
"No Court is bound by such a decision taken to withdraw from the prosecution. Even if an application is made under Section 321 of CrPC, the Courts are duty bound to assess whether a prima facie case is made out or not and that the Court has power to reject the prayer," the court had observed.
The People's Union of Civil Liberties had taken serious note of Karnataka government decision to drop criminal cases against several BJP leaders also included one against the state's Law Minister J. C. Madhuswamy and BJP national general secretary C. T. Ravi, charged under Sections 143 (unlawful assembly) and 147 (rioting) of the Indian Penal Code.
The case was related to a scuffle that broke out between students of two communities in Mysuru district's Hunsur city in November 2015.
A separate case from 2017 that was withdrawn against Hospete MLA and Forest Minister, S. Anand Singh pertained to blocking of the taluk office by 300 locals after stone-pelting and vandalism. The incident had led to property damage of Rs 3 lakh. Singh, who was then with the Congress, was accused of criminal intimidation, assault on a government official and obstruction of duty.
