Live
- BJP releases ‘charge sheet’ against BJD govt
- District Nodal Officer Venkataramana announced the intermediate results
- She team that stopped child marriages
- Medical devices sector needs separate rules, says industry body AiMeD
- Andhra Paper declares lockout
- Opposition INDIA bloc working on 'one year, one PM' formula: PM Modi
- Delhi HC quashes FIR for outraging woman's modesty, orders man to assist Traffic Police for a month as settlement
- 'Apologise to families of farmers who committed suicide in Vidarbha', Amit Shah dares Sharad Pawar
- SC Collegium recommends appointment of a permanent judge in Chhattisgarh HC, extension of term of two judges
- U20 Men's football nationals: Telangana, Sikkim earn full points with easy win
Supreme Court rejects convict's plea claiming juvenility
The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Pawan Kumar Gupta, one of the death row convicts in the 2012 Nirbhaya gangrape and murder case.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Pawan Kumar Gupta, one of the death row convicts in the 2012 Nirbhaya gangrape and murder case. Pawan had claimed that he was a juvenile at the time of the commission of the offence, but the Delhi High Court had ignored this fact.
A bench headed by Justice R Banumathi announced the verdict on Monday itself.
After the verdict by the court, Nirbhaya's mother Asha Devi said that the tactics of the convicts to delay the execution have been rejected now.
"Their tactic to delay hanging has been rejected. I'll be satisfied only when they're hanged on Feb 1.Just like they're delaying it one after other, they must be hanged one by one so that they understand what it means to toy with law," she said post the dismissal of Pawan's plea.
Advocate A P Singh, appearing for the death row convict Pawan Kumar Gupta, said that as per his school leaving certificate he was a minor at the time of the offence and none of the courts, including trial court and high court, ever considered his documents.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Delhi police, said that his claim of juvenility was considered at each and every judicial forum and it will be a travesty of justice if the convict is allowed to raise the claim of juvenility repeatedly and at this point of time.
He said the convict was 19 years old at the time of offence and there is a certified copy of his birth certificate as well as school leaving certificate which was taken on record by each and every judicial forum.
