Live
- BJP MP candidate Bharat Prasad visited the student who tried to commit suicide
- PM’s popularity in the fast lane: Autos with 'Har Dil Mein Modi' slogan spotted across Delhi
- Delhi-based political parties are like East India Company: Sukhbir Badal
- Golf: Diksha moves into Top-20 at South African Women’s Open
- KCR lashes out against BJP and Congress for destroying Telangana
- Dairy Science students visited the Milk cooling plant
- Moody feels Pant ahead in keepers’ race for T20 WC squad; Srikkanth picks Rahul over Samson as reserve keeper
- Thanking voters for extending 'unparalleled support' to NDA, PM Modi says second phase 'too good'
- Natural Relief for Menstrual Cramps: Beetroot Juice Recipe
- Asha Worker died in a road accident
Broader consensus among parties for setting up judicial services
Lok Janshakti Party chief and BJP ally Ram Vilas Paswan has pitched for a broader consensus among political parties to push for setting up of an all India judicial services that will pave the way for quota for backward communities in the judiciary
New Delhi: Lok Janshakti Party chief and BJP ally Ram Vilas Paswan has pitched for a broader consensus among political parties to push for setting up of an all India judicial services that will pave the way for quota for backward communities in the judiciary.
Paswan said the Union government alone cannot do this as it will require a constitutional amendment and added that a general consensus should emerge among political parties for pushing the measure through.
Dalit and tribal MPs from almost all major parties have long been demanding an all India judicial services on the lines of existing all India services like IAS, citing a very low representation of judges from backward communities, especially in the higher judiciary.
Besides Paswan, another BJP ally and Union minister Upendra Kushwaha have also thrown his weight behind the proposal so that provisions for reservation could be made in the higher judiciary.
The RLSP chief has been constantly criticising the collegium system through which judges are appointed in high courts and the SC saying it had become a "breeding ground for favouritism".
