Live
- Over 7,600 Syrians return from Turkiye in five days after Assad's downfall: minister
- Delhi BJP leaders stay overnight in 1,194 slum clusters
- Keerthy Suresh and Anthony Thattil Tie the Knot in a Christian Ceremony
- AAP, BJP making false promises to slum dwellers for votes: Delhi Congress
- 'Vere Level Office' Review: A Refreshing Take on Corporate Life with Humor and Heart
- Libya's oil company declares force majeure at key refinery following clashes
- Illegal Rohingyas: BJP seeks Assembly session to implement NRC in Delhi
- Philippines orders full evacuation amid possible volcanic re-eruption
- Government Prioritizes Welfare of the Poor, says Dola Sri Bala Veeranjaneyaswamy
- Two Russian oil tankers with 29 on board damaged due to bad weather
Just In
The message of the Union Budget of 2015-16 is clear and unambiguous: the Modi government is not bothered about something as trivial as 90% of this country’s population. The real mission is to help the rich to become even richer. The talk was about the poor, but the numbers were for only the rich.
The message of the Union Budget of 2015-16 is clear and unambiguous: the Modi government is not bothered about something as trivial as 90% of this country’s population. The real mission is to help the rich to become even richer. The talk was about the poor, but the numbers were for only the rich.
In the name of limiting the fiscal deficit to 3.9% of the GDP, essential social expenditures were axed. Despite all the talk of women empowerment, budget allocation for women (gender budget) has been reduced from Rs 90,000 crores last year to Rs 80,000 crore. For SC Sub-plan, the allocation went down from Rs 43,000 crore to Rs 30,000 crore. Tribal Sub-Plan’s funds were reduced from Rs 26,000 crore to Rs 19,000 crore. Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) was not spared either.
From last year, its allocation has been halved to just Rs 8,000 crore. Funds for Health and Family Welfare were cut by more than Rs 5,000 crore and those for Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation were cut by Rs 400 crore. The budget also increased government’s dependence on indirect taxes for revenues. An additional amount of Rs 23,300 core in indirect taxes will be collected compared to last year. This will impact the ordinary Indians by increasing the prices of goods and services. The increase in service tax from 12% to 14% will also impact the self-employed population.
When it came to the ultra-rich, the Finance Minister seemed to have forgotten about the fiscal deficit. Direct taxes, which are mostly taxes on the well-off, have been reduced by Rs 8,315 crore. The rich are not only going to get the benefit from reduced direct taxes, but wealth tax has been abolished as well, considering India’s top 1% owns 49% of country’s wealth.
The corporate sector did not go unrewarded either. The taxes on corporates are going to be greatly reduced: from 30% to 25% over next 4 years. Further, foreign corporates would no longer need to pay minimum alternate tax (MAT). The implementation of General Anti Avoidance Rules of Taxation (GAAR), which was meant to curb tax avoidance of the MNCs, has been postponed.
If the government did not subsidise the rich in the form of tax concessions, the budget actually would have been a surplus budget - because the total amount tax concessions (Rs 5,89,000 crore) is higher than the estimated fiscal deficit (Rs 5,55,000 crore). Instead, in the name of fiscal discipline the subsidies to the needy are being cut.
All the talk of devolution of funds to the state governments turned out be a big lie. In a piece of clever gimmickry, the budget increased the share of states, in taxes and duties. But, it has simultaneously reduced Center’s allocations to many of the schemes jointly funded by the Center and States.
As a result, states would receive anadditional revenue of Rs 64,000 due to increased tax share, but would also face an additional burden of Rs 66,000 crores in compensating for Center’s fund cuts in many of the schemes. The budget is going to worsen the problems of the common man, already suffering from a slowdown in economic activity. Further, the reduction in social expenditure and increase in indirect taxes will also shrink consumption, leading to a reduction in economic activity. With effective demand reduced, no amount of concessions to the corporate sector will revive growth. (newsclick.in)
By:Bodapati Srujana
© 2024 Hyderabad Media House Limited/The Hans India. All rights reserved. Powered by hocalwire.com