Live
- Arjun Das Brings Mufasa to Life in Tamil
- Odisha move to prepare maritime perspective plan
- Jal Jeevan Mission empowering women in rural areas: PM Modi
- Pradhan urges Nadda to set up pharmacy unit in Odisha
- Assembly winter session ends ahead of schedule
- Nepali Army Chief General Ashok Raj Sigdel Strengthens Ties With India In Four-Day Visit
- BRS MLAs, MLCs Skip Second Day of Orientation Classes
- Andhra Pradesh Student Dies in Tragic Car Crash in Leicestershire, 4 Others Injured
- Oppn assails delinking of Waltair div from ECoR
- Rahul Gandhi Vs. Nirmala Sitharaman: War Of Words Over Public Sector Banks
Low level employes give their best during crisis
Low Level Employes Give Their Best During Crisis. A new study has indicated that when the stakes are high, people in positions of low power may perform better by using self-affirmations to boost their confidence.
.jpg)
Washington: A new study has indicated that when the stakes are high, people in positions of low power may perform better by using self-affirmations to boost their confidence.
The study conducted at Society for Personality and Social Psychology conducted three experiments to measure performance in pressure-filled situations. When participants were in a position of high power, they tended to perform better under pressure, while those with less power performed worse.
Lead researcher Sonia Kang, Ph.D, asserted that most people have experienced a time in their lives when they aren't performing up to their potential and they take a test or have a performance review at work, but something holds them back and performance in these situations is closely related to how we are expected to behave.
In the first experiment, 134 participants (60 percent women) were assigned in same-sex pairs to portray a recruiter or job candidate in a competitive negotiation involving the setting of salary, vacation time and other job benefits and to increase the pressure, half of the paired participants were told the negotiation was an accurate gauge of their negotiating skills. Participants in the low-pressure situation were told the exercise would teach them negotiation concepts and was not an accurate gauge of their negotiating abilities.
In a second experiment, 60 male MBA students were paired together as the buyer or seller of a biotechnology plant. The sellers, who were in a position of power, were more assertive under pressure and negotiated a higher selling price, while the buyers performed worse under pressure.
The final experiment used the same biotechnology plant exercise with 88 MBA students (33 male pairs and 11 female pairs), but all participants were told the exercise would gauge their negotiating skills to raise the stakes. Before the negotiation, half of the participants wrote for five minutes about their most important negotiating skill, while the remaining half wrote about their least important negotiating skill. Buyers who completed the positive self-affirmation performed significantly better in negotiating a lower sale price for the biotechnology plant, effectively reducing the power differences between the buyer and seller.
The study is published online in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
