Live
- Government Committed to Resolving ASHA Workers' Issues: Minister Damodar Raja Narasimha
- 'Refrain from interfering in municipal polls': Union Minister Ravneet Bittu tells Punjab officials
- SC grants anticipatory bail to accused in POCSO case
- Rising Rajasthan Summit to return in 2026, says CM Sharma
- Kerala HC issues contempt notice to official over elephant regulation violations
- 3rd ODI: Have to learn to take things till the end, says Harmanpreet after India's 3-0 defeat to Australia
- Brook is probably the best Test batter in the world right now, says Ponting
- Congress to fight alone in Delhi, Alok Sharma labels AAP a 'distraction'
- EPFO Subscribers Alert: Withdraw Provident Fund Money Directly From ATMs Soon
- Shehla Rashid calls PM Modi a 'fair administrator,' shares her journey from critic to admirer
GO 123: HC extends time
A two judge bench of the High Court at Hyderabad comprising Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan and Justice U Durga Prasad on Thursday granted further time for certain clarifications for the Telangana government with regards to GO Ms 123.
Hyderabad: A two judge bench of the High Court at Hyderabad comprising Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan and Justice U Durga Prasad on Thursday granted further time for certain clarifications for the Telangana government with regards to GO Ms 123.
It may be recalled that agricultural labour had challenged proceedings under GO Ms 123 contending that it was contrary to mandatory provisions of the Land Acquisition Act which not only provides for compensation but also for a rehabilitation program.
The court had earlier permitted the government to go ahead with provisional registration of sale deeds subject to certain conditions to be in line with the requirements under the Acquisition Act. K Ramakrishna Reddy Telangana Advocate General placed before the court its new order GO 190. K S Murthy, advocate for the petitioners would point out that even the new government order fell woefully short of the responsibilities under the Acquisition Act.
He also said that a detailed response by affidavit was warranted. The bench accordingly adjourned the matter to Tuesday.
