Live
- NASA performs investigation on grounded Ingenuity Helicopter on Mars
- MLA Veerlapalli flags off ambulance service
- RMP operates from govt clinic premises
- Vijaya Chaitanya Palanki Quadruples A/B Testing Speed, Boosting ROI
- Expert Insights from Krishna Mohan Pitchikala on Metrics for Software Performance
- 15 Years of Transformation: Oakridge International School, Bachupally Celebrates Founder's Day
- Takshasila celebrates annual day
- Three killed in Israeli airstrike on Lebanese town
- 3 months after opening, Morampudi Flyover remains incomplete
- Skill enhancement session organised for school teachers
Just In
There has been widespread debate alleging that chatbots undermine the grading process and facilitate cheating among students.
Bengaluru: There has been widespread debate alleging that chatbots undermine the grading process and facilitate cheating among students. Professors and instructors, however, have a variety of techniques for spotting plagiarism and confirming the authenticity of the student's work.
"The use of language models like ChatGPT to generate assignments and essays could potentially lead to unethical behavior, such as cheating on exams or plagiarism. This is because students could easily use language models to generate answers that they submit as their own work. However, it is important to note that while ChatGPT can generate high-quality text, it is not a substitute for a student's own understanding and mastery of the material," A I enthusiast Harsha Kanuri added.
"Moreover, using language models for cheating goes against the ethical principles of education and undermines the value of academic degrees. It is important for students to understand that the goal of education is to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills, and to gain a deep understanding of the material being studied. While language models like ChatGPT may present challenges to the grading system, it is ultimately up to educational institutions and instructors to set clear guidelines and expectations for student work, and to enforce appropriate consequences for unethical behavior," said Kanuri.
ChatGPT does not, however, affect a student's ability to learn. "As a language model, ChatGPT does not directly affect the learning ability of students. However, it can provide students with information and answer questions, which can support their learning process. It is important to note that ChatGPT is not a substitute for human teachers and should be used as a tool to enhance, not replace, traditional learning methods. Ultimately, the effect ChatGPT has on a student's learning ability will depend on how it is integrated into their education and the responsibilities of their teachers and caregivers," he asserted.
ChatGPT and other similar AI language models offer a great deal of promise to increase efficiency and automate some processes, but they shouldn't be used to replace human workers.
"ChatGPT is a powerful tool that represents the current state of the art in AI language generation. Its ability to generate coherent and coherent responses to text inputs is impressive, but it is still limited by the quality and diversity of the data it was trained on. It is important to remember that ChatGPT is an AI model and not a human being.
While it can generate human-like responses, it lacks the emotional intelligence, personal experience, and empathy that are unique to human beings. They are best used as a supplement to human intelligence, rather than a substitute for it," Kanuri concluded.
© 2024 Hyderabad Media House Limited/The Hans India. All rights reserved. Powered by hocalwire.com