Live
- Congress eyes opening of account in Prakasam
- World’s highest polling station in HP has 52 voters
- Zero voter turnout in 6 Nagaland dists
- PM takes ‘atta’ dig at Pakistan
- Cong outdated: Rajnath
- Anantapur: Give no more chances to Jagan says Chandrababu Naidu
- Congress strategy to outwit BJP in North Telangana
- Festival of Demiocracy: 62% turnout in phase 1
- MyVoice: Views of our readers 20th April 2024
- Is US Prez weighing climate emergency declaration soon
US intelligence community acknowledges two theories of coronavirus origin
The US Intelligence Community does not know exactly where, when, or how the COVID-19 virus was transmitted initially but has coalesced around two likely scenarios. (Picture Credits: Reuters)
The US intelligence community acknowledged that its agencies had two theories about the coronavirus's origins. Two agencies believed it emerged naturally from human contact with infected animals, while a third believed it was the result of a laboratory accident.
"The U.S. Intelligence Community does not know exactly where, when, or how the Covid-19 virus was transmitted initially but has coalesced around two likely scenarios," the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) said, adding that the majority believes there is not "sufficient information to assess one to be more likely than the other."
The ODNI statement did not identify which two of the 17 agencies constituting the U.S. intelligence community believes the virus had originated with infected animals and which agency believes it originated with a laboratory accident.
In both cases, however, ODNI said the agencies that back one theory of origin or the other did so with "low or moderate confidence" — which in spy jargon means they believe the evidence supporting their view is far from conclusive.
A source familiar with intelligence community analyses said neither the CIA nor the Defence Intelligence Agency presently favour either alternative explanation for the virus' origin, adding they were among the large majority of U.S. agencies who believe information presently is insufficient to determine that one scenario was more likely than the other.
