Live
- Why plant-based milks may not be healthy
- Jharkhand: Ayushman Bharat cards in demand, Sahebganj residents rush to the centre
- Supreme Court likely to pass directions on implementation of policy to curb air pollution in Delhi-NCR tomorrow
- The first day of Group-2 Paper 1, 2 exams in Wanaparthy district ended peacefully, said Additional Collector Revenue G. Venkateswarlu
- VP Dhankhar urges corporates to invest in education
- Punjab DGP, MHA official request farmer leader Dallewal to end 20-day fast
- Stage Collapse During Swearing-In Ceremony of KUDA chairman in Kakinada
- Govt unveils ‘Jalvahak’ to boost inland waterways
- List of criminals: Delhi BJP chief on AAP panel of 38 candidates
- PSBs in India clock record Rs 1.41 lakh crore in net profit in FY24
Cross-check more votes on VVPATs: SC
- SC was hearing a plea by Oppn parties, led by AP Chief Minister Naidu
- Court favours increasing random physical verification of VVPAT slips
- EC says it is fully satisfied with purity of elections with present system
- It’s a matter of ‘satisfaction’ rather than casting aspersions: Apex court
- Asks EC to file affidavit indicating reasons for satisfaction by March 28
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday favoured increasing the random physical verification of VVPAT slips in the upcoming Lok Sabha and Assembly polls and told the EC that "no institution should insulate itself from improvement, including the judiciary".
It was not the question of "casting aspersions", rather a matter of "satisfaction" of the electorate, the top court said. It asked the EC to file response as to whether it can increase the number of sample surveys of VVPAT slips from one in each Assembly segment for the upcoming general and Assembly elections.
The court was hearing a plea filed by 21 Opposition leaders, led by Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu, seeking that VVPAT slips of at least 50 per cent of voting machines in each Assembly constituency be checked randomly in the Lok Sabha elections next month.
A bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Deepak Gupta asked the EC to file its reply on affidavit indicating the reasons of its satisfaction that purity of elections can be maintained and is being maintained.
"The Election Commission of India (EC) is fully satisfied that the purity of the elections can be maintained and is being maintained. The Election Commission of India shall indicate the above in an affidavit the basis of satisfaction," the bench said.
It further said, "The Election Commission of India shall also indicate that if the sample survey can be extended to a higher level…the affidavit shall be filed by 4pm on March 28. The matter is listed for further hearing on April 1."
At the outset, the bench told the deputy election commissioner Sudeep Jain, appearing in person, whether the poll panel can increase the number of random physical verification of VVPAT slips with EVMs from the existing stipulation of only one polling station per Assembly segment.
Jain replied that the ECI has adequate reasons to believe that there was no requirement for changing the present arrangement of random matching of VVPAT slips with Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) for one polling booth per Assembly segment.
To this the bench said, "It is not the question of casting aspersions rather it is question of satisfaction. Two is better than one. Tell us, can you do a little more. We would like to increase it. Can you increase it? If you are willing to do it on your own do it but if not, then give the reasons."
Jain replied that the present arrangement of counting of VVPAT slips in one polling booth per Assembly constituency in Assembly polls and in one polling booth in each Assembly segment for Lok Sabha polls has worked well but the poll panel is open to suggestions.
The bench was seemingly dissatisfied with the persistent response of the EC official that the present system has been working well and asked the poll panel to file an affidavit detailing the reasons of its satisfaction that there was no need for any improvement.
"If the present system was working well then why did you not start using VVPAT on your own. Why did you need court orders for that (earlier)? Why did the judges have to think about it? Why did you oppose the court's suggestion at that time? You had opposed at that time but yet we did it," the bench said.
It further said, "No institution shall insulate itself from improvement, including judiciary. There is always a scope for improvement. Everyone needs improvement".
The bench had on March 15, issued notice to the ECI and asked the competent authority to depute an officer to assist the court in the matter.
The leaders from six national and 15 regional parties, claiming to represent 70-75 per cent of the population, have also sought the setting aside of the EC guidelines on random verification of one Assembly seat.
The parties include the Congress, Nationalist Congress Party, Aam Aadmi Party, CPI (Marxist), CPI, Trinamool Congress, Samajwadi Party, Bahujan Samaj Party, Rashtriya Lok Dal, Loktantrik Janata Dal and the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK).
The plea had referred to the 1975 verdict of the apex court in the case of former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi which held that free and fair elections are part of the basic structure of the Constitution of India.
