Live
- Why plant-based milks may not be healthy
- Jharkhand: Ayushman Bharat cards in demand, Sahebganj residents rush to the centre
- Supreme Court likely to pass directions on implementation of policy to curb air pollution in Delhi-NCR tomorrow
- The first day of Group-2 Paper 1, 2 exams in Wanaparthy district ended peacefully, said Additional Collector Revenue G. Venkateswarlu
- VP Dhankhar urges corporates to invest in education
- Punjab DGP, MHA official request farmer leader Dallewal to end 20-day fast
- Stage Collapse During Swearing-In Ceremony of KUDA chairman in Kakinada
- Govt unveils ‘Jalvahak’ to boost inland waterways
- List of criminals: Delhi BJP chief on AAP panel of 38 candidates
- PSBs in India clock record Rs 1.41 lakh crore in net profit in FY24
President's rule can be imposed if states fail to implement CAA: BJP MP
The lawmaker said that the President would have to exercise his powers under Article 356 of the Constitution to dismiss governments if they do not implement the CAA.
Hoshangabad (Madhya Pradesh): Bharatiya Janata Party MP Uday Pratap Singh on Saturday said that President's rule can be imposed in states who are opposing the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).
"The state governments that are opposing the CAA can be dismissed and President's rule can be imposed there," Singh said, adding that the state governments are bound to implement the law.
The lawmaker said that the President would have to exercise his powers under Article 356 of the Constitution to dismiss governments if they do not implement the CAA.
Article 356 of the Constitution of India empowers the President to withdraw from the Union the executive and legislative powers of any state "if he is satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the government of the state cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution".
Several states including Punjab, Chhattisgarh and Kerala have opposed the law, saying that they would not implement it. Kerala went to the extent to pass a resolution from the Assembly against the law.
