Live
- Direct flights from Rajahmundry to major cities soon
- Search intensified for Gowtham Reddy as HC dismisses his bail plea
- Santosh Trophy final round to begin in Hyderabad tomorrow
- BGT: Rohit must return to opening for Brisbane Test, says Ponting
- Swimming sensation Havya steals the show
- NDTL gets WADA nod to manage Athlete Biological Passport
- BWF World Tour Finals: Treesa-Gayatri wins 2nd match to keep semis hopes alive
- Youngest ever to conquer chess world
- Jamie Lever to star in Lakshmi R Iyer’s ‘2050’: It challenged me emotionally
- Prateeksha Srivastava says she seldom meets fellow music composers Rusha, Blizza, in person
Supreme Court adjourns NEET case to April 7
A five-member bench headed by Supreme Court justice Anil Dave here on Thursday adjourned the NEET case to April 7. As the case was filed before bifurcation the managements association of AP and TS, urged the full bench to allow TS to file its response in writing. It was okayed.
Directs the AP, Telangana governments and management associations to file their counters by March 31
New Delhi: A five-member bench headed by Supreme Court justice Anil Dave here on Thursday adjourned the NEET case to April 7. As the case was filed before bifurcation the managements association of AP and TS, urged the full bench to allow TS to file its response in writing. It was okayed.
The bench which heard the protracted arguments for and against the common entrance test proposed by the Medical Council of India for admissions into medical colleges on Thursday decided to hear the arguments again on the next date of hearing. It directed the State governments and associations of dental colleges to file their written response by March 31, while the MCI and Central government are asked to file their rejoinders within four days later.
It may be recalled that the Medical Council of India had passed a regulation in 2013 seeking to introduce a National Eligibility Entrance Test for medical seats. This was opposed by several States and associations. The apex court struck down the same later. However, the MCI and the Centre sought a revision.
