Live
- Scientists develop flexible near-infrared devices for wearable sensors
- Transforming education for the workforce of tomorrow
- Despite global odds, GDP growth at 6-7% good for India
- IIFL Home Fin to raise Rs 500 cr
- Sensex, Nifty drift lower on profit booking
- Jagan treated cadres as ‘subordinates’, alleges Grandhi
- Mpower’s survey on edu loans
- IIP growth falls to 3.5% in Oct
- Easing food prices lower retail inflation to 5.48% in November
- Space allocation for packaging units at MSME parks on anvil
NEET 2017: Allahabad HC asks CBSE to revise marks
The Allahabad High Court directed the CBSE to revise marks awarded to all candidates who had appeared in the NEET exam this year and decide the \"merit/rank accordingly\" in view of incorrect reply for one of the 180 objective type questions given in the answer key.
Allahabad: The Allahabad High Court directed the CBSE to revise marks awarded to all candidates who had appeared in the NEET exam this year and decide the "merit/rank accordingly" in view of incorrect reply for one of the 180 objective type questions given in the answer key. A Division Bench comprising Justice Tarun Agarwala and Justice Ashok Kumar passed the order while allowing a writ petition filed by S Gigodia who had scored 665 out of 720 marks in the National Eligibility cum Entrance Tests for admission to undergraduate medical courses and secured an all India rank of 137.
The petitioner had moved the court with the contention that he was "dismayed to see that the official answer to question no. 172 of test booklet Y was incorrect" following which he "submitted a representation against the OMR grading on payment of Rs. 1,000".
Upon getting no response from the CBSE, the petitioner filed an RTI application which "remained pending" following which he filed the petition "praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to take a decision on the challenge made by the petitioner" and "to award 05 marks to the petitioner for question no. 172". Allowing the petition, the court, however, remarked, "We find that question no.
172 in test booklet code Y could not be answered correctly by any candidate. We are, therefore, of the opinion that in the larger interest of administration the benefit should be extended not only to the petitioner but to all the candidates." "The petitioner is entitled to be awarded 05 marks (04 marks for the question and 01 mark for minus marking). We also direct the CBSE to give appropriate marks to all the candidates in the like manner for question no. 172 and corresponding question given in other booklets," the court added.
