Live
- Will gift one project daily to people during Jan Kalyan Parv
- Mahakumbh & the Politics of Sanatan Nationalism
- A Soulful Celebration of Global Music
- Brahmin Community delegation felicitates CM Saini
- Allu Arjun Visits Chiranjeevi’s House for Lunch Meet
- Toyota organising TG Grameena Mahotsav
- Special rituals conducted at Maramma Temple
- Siddaramaiah has special love for Muslims: BJP
- We can’t afford spending less than 6% of GDP on healthcare
- Guinness World Record for continuous Hanuman Chalisa chanting
Just In
Supreme Court Orders IMA President to Issue Personal Apology
The Supreme Court of India has mandated RV Asokan, President of the Indian Medical Association (IMA), to personally issue apologies in major newspapers for his critical remarks at the court.
The Supreme Court of India has mandated RV Asokan, President of the Indian Medical Association (IMA), to personally issue apologies in major newspapers for his critical remarks at the court. On Tuesday, a bench comprising Justices Hima Kohli and Sandeep Mehta directed Asokan to publish his apologies at his own expense and not as a representative of the IMA.
“Apology needs to be tendered by you and from your own pocket, not IMA,” the Supreme Court stated.
PS Patwalia informed the court that the controversial interview was given to news agency PTI. To which Justice Kohli responded whether it had been shared to any other publications. “Besides the ones you are referring to, which other publications was it shared with? You have to send an apology to all of them. You cannot just wash your hands off. No assumptions here in your favour just because you say so. Your public apology has to be thorough," Justice Kohli asserted.
The Supreme Court accepted Patwalia’s request to defer the contempt orders against Asokan and granted him time to comply with the court's directive.
IMA vs. Patanjali: What Happened?
IMA accused Patanjali Ayurveda, a prominent Ayurvedic company founded by Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna, of spreading misleading advertisements against scientifically tested and proved allopathy medicine. They alleged that Patanjali was engaged in a smear campaign against modern medicine.
The Supreme Court intervened in the matter and directed the IMA to address unethical practices within the medical profession. However, the IMA's president, Dr. RV Asokan, publicly criticized the court's directive, expressing disappointment and claiming it demoralised doctors.
This public criticism led to a strong rebuke from the Supreme Court, which ordered Dr. Asokan to issue a personal apology and bear the costs all by himself.
This case remarks on the ongoing tension between traditional and modern medicine in India. It also highlights the importance of responsible advertising and maintaining public trust in healthcare systems.
© 2024 Hyderabad Media House Limited/The Hans India. All rights reserved. Powered by hocalwire.com