Live
- Starc, Hazlewood, Cummins added to BBL 14 supplementary lists
- Flood risk in low-lying areas of Chennai as Chembarambakkam Lake’s water level rises
- Pushpa 2 Theatre Canteen Owner Bites Customer’s Ear in Gwalior
- RG Kar tragedy: Statement of forensic doctor who took pictures of victim’s body crucial for CBI
- Include Valmiki community in ST list, MP Ambica pleads
- Nara Lokesh Urges Rapid Investment Approvals to Boost Employment in MSME Sector
- Chandrababu Advocates Strict Measures for Social Welfare and Infrastructure Development in AP
- Show of brotherhood by Vijayan, Stalin at event to honour Dravidian icon
- District Collectors’ conference with CM begins
- Celebrations kick off in Saudi Arabia to welcome FIFA World Cup 2034
Supreme Court stay on dismissal of IPS officer who probed Ishrat Jahan encounter
Supreme Court of India
The Supreme Court on Monday stayed, for a week, the Central government's decision to dismiss senior IPS officer Satish Chandra Verma, who had assisted the CBI in its probe in the alleged fake encounter of Ishrat Jahan in Gujarat.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed, for a week, the Central government's decision to dismiss senior IPS officer Satish Chandra Verma, who had assisted the CBI in its probe in the alleged fake encounter of Ishrat Jahan in Gujarat.
A bench of Justices K.M. Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy directed Verma to take appropriate steps to amend the petition pending before the Delhi High Court to challenge the dismissal order.
Verma was dismissed from service on August 30, ahead of his superannuation on September 30.
He had probed the 2004 Ishrat Jahan case between April 2010 and October 2011 and on his investigation report, a special investigation team held it was a fake encounter.
The top court said it is for the high court to examine whether the stay or vacation of dismissal order is to continue, as it allowed Verma to move the high court to challenge his dismissal.
The bench said the interests of justice would require that the order passed by the respondent dismissing the appellant is not to be implemented till one week from today. It added that it is for the high court to consider whether order of stay of implementation of order passed by disciplinary authority should continue beyond a period of one week.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Verma, argued that the high court had been passing orders on his plea from time to time, and has now posted the case for January 2023. He said his client's petition is getting infructuous, and asked the bench either to transfer the case to the apex court for hearing, or ask the HC to advance the hearing.
Verma had approached the apex court after the high court allowed the Home Ministry to take action against him in view of a departmental inquiry, which proved the charges against him. The charges included interacting "with public media" when he was chief vigilance officer of the North Eastern Electric Power Corporation, Shillong.
