Aircraft crash: IS claims not totally misplaced

Ghoulish responsibility for the crash of the ill-fated Metrojet aircraft in the Sinai desert on October 31 that resulted in the death of all 224 passengers and crew on board the Airbus A 321 has been claimed by the Islamic State (IS). However at the time of writing this comment this has been rejected by the Russian government.

Bound for St. Petersburg in Russia from the popular Egyptian tourist destination Sharm-el-Sheikh, the aircraft crashed 25 minutes after take-off and the first images of the crash revealed an aircraft that had been completely destroyed.

Preliminary reports indicate that the Metrojet aircraft came down as one piece and did not fragment in the manner that the Malaysian commercial aircraft MH 17 did over Ukraine in July 2014. It is also being reported that the Russian Metrojet was flying about 2,000 feet lower than MH 17 but the altitude is deemed to be too high for a shoulder-fired missile to have caused the crash. Hence the skepticism over the claim of the IS.

While more detailed investigations will establish the cause of the crash, the political-military context is instructive and the conjecture about the I S is not totally misplaced. In recent weeks Russia under President Vladimir Putin has embarked upon a muscular military initiative in the Syrian crisis that has seen the Russian military providing valuable support to the beleaguered forces of President Assad. Consequently the IS has been under severe attack and is now on the defensive.

A spectacular attack that would result in the destruction of a Russian asset would have served the purpose of the IS. However as noted earlier, this claim will have to be taken with a large pinch of salt for the IS currently is not estimated to have the kind of air power that would allow an aircraft to be brought down at the altitude that the Metrojet would have acquired.

Could this air power have been provided by a shadowy state entity proxy? It may be recalled that there was similar conjecture and speculation when the ill-fated Malaysian aircraft was brought down in July 2014 and Moscow and Kiev were differently held responsible. The cause of that crash remains unresolved.

For India and other South Asian nations, the security of airports and related assets has been breached by terrorist groups over the last three decades. Hijacking of commercial aircraft has occurred often.

Hence the air-power profile of the IS will remain a matter of grave concern and the capabilities and intent of the quasi-state entity will need to be monitored carefully. In this specific case, it is hoped that the Egyptian and Russian authorities will be able to arrive at a speedy determination about the cause of the Metrojet crash.

In the event that the finger-prints of the IS are conclusively established – then a very firm Russian (read Putin ) response can be expected and the turbulence in the region will increase in a visible manner.

By C Uday Bhaskar