Live
- Tight security arrangements at Group-II examination centers District SP
- Alia Bhatt captures attention in white
- Varun Dhawan talks about ‘Baby John’
- ‘Moonwalk’ trailer promises a quirky heist, love, and loyalty
- Combat leaf spot disease
- Ahsaas Channaopens up about her complex character in ‘Mismatched 3’
- Radhika Apte welcomes first child, shares heartfelt post
- Jacqueline dazzles at Da-Bangg Reloaded concert
- Time to boost measures to prevent drowning, save children: WHO
- TDP achieves milestone with 73 lakhs membership registration, says Chandrababu
Major AI models not very transparent: Report
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence (AI) based foundations models such as Meta's Llama 2 and OpenAI’s GPT-4 are low on transparency, according to a global report on Thursday.
New York: Artificial intelligence (AI) based foundations models such as Meta's Llama 2 and OpenAI’s GPT-4 are low on transparency, according to a global report on Thursday.
The Foundation Model Transparency Index created by a group of eight AI researchers from Stanford University, MIT Media Lab, and Princeton University, tracked 10 most popular AI models who disclosed information about their work and how people use their systems.
The report showed that “no major foundation model developer is close to providing adequate transparency, revealing a fundamental lack of transparency in the AI industry”.
Among the models it tested, Meta’s Llama 2 (54 per cent) scored the highest, closely followed by BloomZ (53 per cent) and then OpenAI’s GPT-4 (48 per cent).
Other models evaluated include Stability’s Stable Diffusion (47 per cent), Google’s PaLM 2 (40 per cent), Anthropic’s Claude (36 per cent), Command from Cohere (34 per cent), AI21 Labs’ Jurassic 2 (25 per cent), Inflection-1 (21 per cent) from Inflection, and Amazon’s Titan (12 per cent).
“While the societal impact of these models is rising, transparency is on the decline. If this trend continues, foundation models could become just as opaque as social media platforms and other previous technologies, replicating their failure modes,” the researchers said.
The report defined transparency based on 100 indicators for information about how the models are built, how they work, and how people use them. The researchers assessed these companies on the basis of their most salient and capable foundation model and systematically gathered information made publicly available by the developer as of September 15.
For each developer, two researchers scored the 100 indicators, assessing whether the developer satisfied the indicator on the basis of public information.
The initial scores were shared with leaders at each company, encouraging them to contest scores they disagreed with.
Although the mean score was just 37 per cent, 82 of the indicators were satisfied by at least one developer. This means that developers can significantly improve transparency by adopting best practices from their competitors, the researchers said.
“This provides a snapshot of transparency across the AI ecosystem. All developers have significant room for improvement that we will aim to track in the future versions of the Index,” the researchers noted.
