New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday held that fresh law graduates cannot appear in judicial services examination, mandating a minimum three years of legal practice for candidates applying to entry-level posts.

The verdict will have far-reaching implications for judicial service aspirants.

A bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih reaffirmed the importance of courtroom exposure for prospective judges.

“The appointment of fresh law graduates has led to several difficulties, as noted by multiple high courts. Practical experience in court is essential for ensuring judicial efficiency and competence,” the CJI said while pronouncing the judgement.

The bench said the minimum of three years of legal practice is mandatory for appearing in the judicial service examination for entry-level civil judge posts that are lower division cadre.

The verdict came on a plea filed by the All India Judges Association.

The CJI said allowing fresh law graduates direct entry into the judiciary has created practical challenges, as reflected in reports submitted by various high courts.

The judgement was issued in response to a petition filed by the All India Judges Association. The CJI observed that permitting direct recruitment of fresh law graduates into the judiciary has caused tangible difficulties, as reflected in reports submitted by various High Courts. The bench also clarified that the required period of practice could be counted from the date of provisional enrolment.

However, this new condition will not affect recruitment drives that have already been initiated by the High Courts before the date of the judgement. It will only be applicable to future selections.