Asian elephants have maths skills similar to humans
Asian elephants demonstrate numeric ability which is closer to that observed in humans rather than in other animals, according to a study Researchers at SOKENDAI The Graduate University for Advanced Studies in Japan found that an Asian elephants sense of numbers is not affected by distance, magnitude or ratios of presented numerosities
Tokyo: Asian elephants demonstrate numeric ability which is closer to that observed in humans rather than in other animals, according to a study. Researchers at SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies) in Japan found that an Asian elephants' sense of numbers is not affected by distance, magnitude or ratios of presented numerosities.
The finding, published in the Journal of Ethology, provides initial experimental evidence that non-human animals have cognitive characteristics similar to human counting. Previous research has shown that many animals have some form of numerical competence, even though they do not use language. However, this numerical ability is mainly based on inaccurate quantity instead of absolute numbers. In the new study, the researchers aimed to replicate the results of previous research that already showed that Asian elephants have exceptional numeric competence.
The researchers developed a new method to test how well the animals can judge relative quantity. They successfully trained a 14-year old Asian elephant called Authai from the Ueno Zoo in Japan to use a computer-controlled touch panel. The programme was specifically designed to examine the cognition of elephants, so that any unintended factors potentially influencing the results could be ruled out. Authai was presented with a relative numerosity judgment task on the screen, and then had to indicate with the tip of her trunk which one of the two figures shown to her at a time contained more items. These ranged from 0 to 10 items, and contained pictures of bananas, watermelons and apples.
The fruits were not all presented in the same size, to ensure that Authai did not make her choices purely on the total area that was covered with illustrations per card. Authai was rewarded whenever she chose the figures featuring the larger number of items. This she did correctly 181 out of 271 times -- a success rate of 66.8 per cent.
Her ability to accurately pinpoint the figure with the most fruits on it was not affected by the magnitude, distance or ratio of the comparisons, researchers said. Authai's reaction time was, however, influenced by the distance and ratio between the two figures presented. She needed significantly more time to make her selection between figures were relatively smaller distances and larger ratios were presented.