Live
- Ahsaas Channaopens up about her complex character in ‘Mismatched 3’
- Radhika Apte welcomes first child, shares heartfelt post
- Jacqueline dazzles at Da-Bangg Reloaded concert
- Time to boost measures to prevent drowning, save children: WHO
- TDP achieves milestone with 73 lakhs membership registration, says Chandrababu
- South Korea: Main Oppn hails Yoon's impeachment motion passage as 'victory for people, democracy'
- RG Kar issue: Tension flared over parallel protests by Congress, SUCI(C) outside CBI offices
- After furore, Central Railway revokes order to raze Lord Hanuman Temple at Dadar
- Now hoteliers' body in Bengal's Alipurduar shut doors for Bangladeshi tourists
- District Collector Encourages Students to Utilize Government Facilities for a Better Future
Bombay HC to NIA: Are you permitted to truncate documents
The Bombay High Court on Tuesday asked the National Investigation Agency NIA if it had sought permission to truncate the documents and witnesses statements that were part of the 2008 Malegaon blast case charge sheet
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Tuesday asked the National Investigation Agency (NIA) if it had sought permission to truncate the documents and witnesses’ statements that were part of the 2008 Malegaon blast case charge sheet.
A division bench of Justices A S Oka and Ajey Gadkari was hearing an application filed by one of the accused, Lt Col Prasad Purohit, seeking non-truncated copies of the documents and statements of witnesses.
Purohit had earlier filed the application in the high court challenging the applicability of provisions of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) in the case.
His advocate, Shrikant Shivade, told the court on Tuesday that when the first probe agency, the state Anti Terrorism Squad (ATS), filed its charge sheet in the case, several documents and witnesses’ statements were truncated or masked.
He claimed that the agency never sought the court’s permission to truncate or mask the documents and had done so at its own discretion.
The bench then sought to know if the National Investigation Agency (NIA), which is now the prosecuting agency, had taken court’s permission for it.
“Has the court passed any order allowing the documents and statements to be truncated? Or has the prosecution filed any application before the court to this effect?
The investigating officer does not have the powers to truncate documents like this,” Justice Oka said. The bench directed NIA lawyer Sandesh Patil to take instructions from the officers concerned and posted the matter for further hearing on February 26.
Six people were killed and over 100 injured when an explosive device strapped to a motorcycle went off near a mosque in Malegaon, a town about 200 km from here in north Maharashtra, on September 29, 2008.
In October 2018, a special court had framed charges under the UAPA against Purohit, Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and some other accused persons in the case.
