e-signatures considered artificial

e-signatures considered artificial
Highlights

People trust e-signatures significantly less than traditional hand signatures, finds a study, adding that most of them treat e-signatures as ‘artificial and robotic’. Eileen Chou, assistant professor from University of Virginia, found that while e-signatures and hand signatures share the same objective function

New York: People trust e-signatures significantly less than traditional hand signatures, finds a study, adding that most of them treat e-signatures as ‘artificial and robotic’. Eileen Chou, assistant professor from University of Virginia, found that while e-signatures and hand signatures share the same objective function, documents signed electronically evoke strikingly different – and significantly more negative – psychological reactions.

"People don't trust the value of e-signatures, citing as their main reason the sense that e-signers were less involved and committed," she was quoted as saying in a LiveScience report. During the study, she randomly assigned participants to review a travel reimbursement, mortgage application, or leasing contract that had been signed either by hand or electronically.

They included four types of e-signatures in common use: PIN, avatar, checked box or software-generated signature. The results showed that reviewers found these common types of e-signatures to be less convincing and trustworthy than traditional hand signatures. However, software-generated signatures fared better than the others types of e-signatures, the author noted. The paper appeared in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science.

Show Full Article
Download The Hans India Android App or iOS App for the Latest update on your phone.
More Stories


Top