Top

Interest rate cut and the U-turn

Interest rate cut and the U-turn
x

Interest rate cut and the U-turn 

Highlights

The government had announced a cut in small savings rate on March 31st but withdrew it in a few hours. For example, the interest rate on 5-year National Savings Certificate (NSC) was cut from 7.9 percent to 6.8 percent.

More important is to note that our economic growth rate has been declining in the last six years. The Covid-19 pandemic has made the situation worse. The second wave of Covid-19 presents a further danger. A shopkeeper told me only the other day that his sales were still down by 25 percent from the pre-Covid levels. Accordingly, his profits were less, the goods purchased by him from the market for his consumption were less, and the total demand for goods in the market was also less. The businesspersons do not find it profitable to take loans for investment in this condition. They would take loan from the bank and put up a new factory if there is demand in the market. They will not put up a new factory and not take loan from the bank when the demand for paper in the market is less. I think they would not take a loan even if the interest rate was made zero — as is seen in countries like Japan where there is no borrowing from the banks and growth is lagging despite zero interest rates

The government had announced a cut in small savings rate on March 31st but withdrew it in a few hours. For example, the interest rate on 5-year National Savings Certificate (NSC) was cut from 7.9 percent to 6.8 percent. The interest rates on Kisan Vikas Patra, Senior Citizens Savings Scheme and Provident Fund were reduced and restored in tandem.

There is no serious reason for the depositors to cry foul, however. The interest rates need to change in parallel with the rate of inflation. For example, the interest rate on NSC in 2020-21 was 7.9 percent while the rate of inflation was 4.9 percent. The "real" interest rate obtained by the depositor was only 3.0 percent. The real interest rate is less because value of the principal amount reduces in the same measure as the rate of inflation. Let us say you deposited Rs 100 in a fixed deposit with a bank last year with an interest rate of 4.9 percent. You would have got one kilo of high-quality basmati rice last year. Now, you got Rs 104.90 from the bank this year with an interest Rs 4.90 added to it. However, the price of basmati rice has increased to Rs 104.90 per kilo in the meantime. Therefore, you would get the same 1,000 grams of rice for Rs 104.90 this year. The "real" gain to the depositor is the difference between the interest rate and inflation.

The rate of inflation has reduced from 4.9 percent to 3.7 percent at present. The rate of interest on the NSC, however, remains unchanged. The depositor will get Rs 107.9 on a deposit of Rs 100 in an NSC made last year. Thus, the real interest rate obtained by him would be 4.2 percent (7.9 interest rate minus 3.7 inflation rate). The real interest rate was 3.0 percent last year (7.9 interest rate minus 4.9 inflation rate). This has increased to 4.2 percent this year because the rate of interest has remained unchanged while the inflation has reduced. The reduction of interest rate on NSC from 7.9 percent to 6.8 percent done by the government, if it had been implemented, would have led to the depositor still getting a real interest rate of 3.1 percent (6.8 interest rate minus 3.7 inflation rate) — which would be nearly the same as the 3.0 percent real interest rate obtained by her last year.

The second justification for the reduction of interest rates is that the money deposited in these savings scheme is actually a loan taken by the government. About 95 percent of this money is used for government consumption expenditures and only 5 percent are used for public investment. The banks, in contrast, lend more for investment. I reckon about 50 percent of the money deposited with the banks goes to loans given for investments such as in buying taxis or putting up factories. The problem is that the interest obtained by the depositor from NSC is 7.9 percent while a 5-year fixed deposit with the State Bank of India would get him only 5.4 percent. Therefore, the depositors are reluctant to deposit with the banks. Correspondingly, the ability of the banks to give banks for investment is less just as the ability of the homemaker to invest in an online course for the child is less if she has less income. It was necessary to reduce the interest rates on NSC so that it became attractive for the depositors to deposit with the banks.

The third justification for reduction in the interest rate is that the government is able to borrow as much money at it wants through the sale of government securities at an interest rate of 6.2 percent. In comparison, the Government has to pay interest of 7.9 percent on NSC. Thus, the government has to bear an additional burden of 1.7 percent on the monies borrowed from the NSC. Let us say the government pays an additional Rs 1 crore as interest on NSC. The government has to collect taxes from the people from some other method to make this 1 crore payment. Therefore, the high interest rates on NSC only mean that the government will collect taxes from the people and provide additional benefits to the depositors of NSC. This would be like the head of the industrial establishment cutting the salaries of the workers and increasing the salaries of the supervisors.

The reduction of rate of interest on small savings such as NSC was justified for the abovementioned three reasons, namely, lower inflation, encouraging deposits in the banks and burden on the Government. The withdrawal of the reduction was not justified. I am confident that the Government will be compelled to again make this reduction soon.

More important is to note that our economic growth rate has been declining in the last six years. The Covid-19 pandemic has made the situation worse. The second wave of Covid-19 presents a further danger. A shopkeeper told me only the other day that his sales were still down by 25 percent from the pre-Covid levels. Accordingly, his profits were less, the goods purchased by him from the market for his consumption were less, and the total demand for goods in the market was also less. The businesspersons do not find it profitable to take loans for investment in this condition. They would take loan from the bank and put up a new factory if there is demand in the market. They will not put up a new factory and not take loan from the bank when the demand for paper in the market is less. I think they would not take a loan even if the interest rate was made zero — as is seen in countries like Japan where there is no borrowing from the banks and growth is lagging despite zero interest rates.

The government has focused on making it easier for the businesspersons to take loans to rev up the economy. However, that is not happening because of absence of demand. Therefore, the government must change gears. Instead of focusing on lowering interest rates alone, the government must in parallel make cash transfers to the common man as done in the United States and other countries to put purchasing power in the hands of the people, create demand in the market and jumpstart the economy.

(The author is formerly Professor of Economics at IIM, Bengaluru)

Show Full Article
Print Article
Subscribed Failed...
Subscribed Successfully...
Next Story
More Stories