Live
- Megastar Chiranjeevi to Visit Allu Arjun’s Residence at 12 PM Today
- Nilima Rane: Trailblazer in Nursing
- Casual yet stylish office outfits for all-day comfort
- TTD to suspend all special darshans from January 10 to 19 amid Vaikuntha dwara darshans
- Naidu pats TDP leaders, cadres for enrolling 73L members
- Rupali Ganguly says for 20 years she never got an award
- Advanced anti-drone systems deployed for devotees’ safety at Mahakumbh
- Workshop on ‘Industry-Academia Practices in Civil Engineering’ concludes
- Revanth assures Kurma community of its due
- 204 cadets pass out of AFA
Service Tax: Madras High Court stays GST notice on AR Rahman till March 4
The show-cause notice has misinterpreted the provisions of the Copyright Act and presumed producer as the first owner of musical works, Rahman submitted.
Chennai: In a relief to music composer AR Rahman, the Madras High Court on Wednesday stayed the operation of a notice issued by Goods and Services Tax authorities demanding service tax for the permanent transfer of copyrights of his musical works to producers of such movies.
Rahman's contention was that a composer of a musical work becomes the absolute owner of the copyright for their work under the Copyrights Act and subsequent transfer of such rights to producers of movies are exempted from tax.
Admitting the plea, Justice Anita Sumanth passed the interim order staying the operation of the notice issued by the commissioner of GST and central excise, Chennai dated October 17, 2019, till March 4.
The show-cause notice has misinterpreted the provisions of the Copyright Act and presumed producer as the first owner of musical works, Rahman submitted.
The notice proposed to deny the exemption legitimately available and granted by the government with a preconceived mindset based on assumptions and presumptions, he said.
"In terms of section 13(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, copyright subsists in musical work and the composer is the sole and absolute owner of such right.
The said rights are assigned to the producer of movies under agreements executed with the producers which makes them the absolute owner of the copyright," Rahman said.
According to him, such permanent transfer of copyright is not a service for the purpose of levy of service tax.
Even temporary transfer or permitting enjoyment of copyright falling under the Copyright Act is exempted from service tax, he added.
Moreover, section 65B (44) of the Finance Act, 1994 defines 'service' and specifically excludes transfer of title in goods by way of sale, gift or in any other manner, Rahman asserted.
