Live
- NASA Tracks Five Giant Asteroids on Close Approach to Earth Today
- Pushpa 2 Hits ₹1000 Crore in 6 Days: How It Compares to Other Top Indian Films
- Vivo X200 and X200 Pro Launched in India: Price, Specifications, and Features
- Nitin Gadkari Admits Feeling Embarrassed at Global Summits Over Rising Road Accidents in India
- Opposition Slams ‘One Nation, One Election’ Bill as Anti-Democratic; BJP Allies Support the Move
- Celebrate Karthigai Maha Deepam Virtually with Sri Mandir’s LIVE Darshan Experience
- BJP Extends Support to Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan Employees' Strike, Demands Immediate Regularization and Welfare Benefits
- Dr. M. Priyanka Stresses Quality Education, Nutritious Meals, and Cleanliness in Schools
- Mandal Level CM Cup Sports Concludes in Ija with Promising Talent and Enthusiastic Participation
- Harish Rao Slams Revanth Reddy: "More Talk, Less Action"
Supreme Court strikes down rules on tribunals in Finance Act
In a major setback for the Central government, the Supreme Court on Wednesday passed an interim order that said the appointments to tribunals shall be on the basis of existing statutes and not the rules framed under the Finance Act of 2017.
New Delhi: In a major setback for the Central government, the Supreme Court on Wednesday passed an interim order that said the appointments to tribunals shall be on the basis of existing statutes and not the rules framed under the Finance Act of 2017.
A bench led by Chief Justice, hearing petitions against the passage of the Finance Act of 2017 as a Money Bill, ordered the government to reframe the rules and ordered that until then, the existing laws will govern the tribunals. The Ministry of Law has also been asked to conduct an impact study and submit report to the apex court.
The Finance Act had given the Centre the power to govern appointments, removal and service conditions of the members of judicial tribunals like National Green Tribunal, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NCLAT.
The five-judge Constitution Bench, also comprising Justices NV Ramana, DY Chandrachud, Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna, ordered that validity of passage of Finance Act 2017 as Money Bill should be decided by a larger bench.
The petitioners had challenged the Finance Act, 2017, particularly Part XIV on various grounds. The Part XIV had repealed provisions relating to the administration of 26 Tribunals established under diverse central laws.
The central government was given the powers to frame rules by virtue of Section 184. While the SC upheld the Section itself, it struck down the rules formulated under it. The challenge to the Finance Act, 2017, was on the grounds that it was passed as a Money Bill.
