Live
- NASA Tracks Five Giant Asteroids on Close Approach to Earth Today
- Pushpa 2 Hits ₹1000 Crore in 6 Days: How It Compares to Other Top Indian Films
- Vivo X200 and X200 Pro Launched in India: Price, Specifications, and Features
- Nitin Gadkari Admits Feeling Embarrassed at Global Summits Over Rising Road Accidents in India
- Comprehensive Review on Indiramma Housing Survey and Welfare Initiatives Conducted via Video Conference
- Jogulamba Temple Records Rs 1.06 Crore Hundi Revenue in 150 Days
- Opposition Slams ‘One Nation, One Election’ Bill as Anti-Democratic; BJP Allies Support the Move
- Celebrate Karthigai Maha Deepam Virtually with Sri Mandir’s LIVE Darshan Experience
- BJP Extends Support to Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan Employees' Strike, Demands Immediate Regularization and Welfare Benefits
- Dr. M. Priyanka Stresses Quality Education, Nutritious Meals, and Cleanliness in Schools
CID receives red corner notice
CID Additional Director General T Krishna Prasad Receives Red Corner Notice, The CID chief said that he received the Red Corner Notice (RCN, A-2828/4-2014) sent by the CBI which was forwarded along with the US government request for the provisional arrest of the RS member in the Titanium case.
Hyderabad: CID Additional Director General T Krishna Prasad on Friday said that the term ‘warrant’ was missing in the Red Corner Notice (RCN) against Congress MP K V P Ramachandra Rao, which was sent by the CBI. As a result, it was faxed back to the Delhi CBI headquarters for clarification. The CID would act based on further instructions from the CBI, Prasad said. The CID chief said that he received the Red Corner Notice (RCN, A-2828/4-2014) sent by the CBI which was forwarded along with the US government request for the provisional arrest of the RS member in the Titanium case.
.jpg)
Generally, an RCN allows a warrant issued by a national authority to be circulated worldwide, with the request that the person wanted be arrested. Meanwhile, KVP has moved the AP High Court against the RCN and filed a writ petition asking for stay on his arrest. He said that he had no knowledge of the said case in a court in USA and was surprised that he has been allegedly been indicted without hearing him and this order was in sealed cover for nearly one year. He contended that the Criminal Procedure code of India guarantees certain fundamental rights and civil liberties and al this can not be short circuited in the name of a case in court in US. Earlier, the court turned down a lunch motion moved by him against the warrant issued by Interpol for his provisional arrest.
