Live
- NASA Tracks Five Giant Asteroids on Close Approach to Earth Today
- Pushpa 2 Hits ₹1000 Crore in 6 Days: How It Compares to Other Top Indian Films
- Vivo X200 and X200 Pro Launched in India: Price, Specifications, and Features
- Nitin Gadkari Admits Feeling Embarrassed at Global Summits Over Rising Road Accidents in India
- Comprehensive Review on Indiramma Housing Survey and Welfare Initiatives Conducted via Video Conference
- Jogulamba Temple Records Rs 1.06 Crore Hundi Revenue in 150 Days
- Opposition Slams ‘One Nation, One Election’ Bill as Anti-Democratic; BJP Allies Support the Move
- Celebrate Karthigai Maha Deepam Virtually with Sri Mandir’s LIVE Darshan Experience
- BJP Extends Support to Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan Employees' Strike, Demands Immediate Regularization and Welfare Benefits
- Dr. M. Priyanka Stresses Quality Education, Nutritious Meals, and Cleanliness in Schools
HC refuses to take up HCA plea
The vacation Bench of the High Court at Hyderabad comprising Justice C Praveen Kumar and Justice Challa Kodandaram on Wednesday refused to take on file a writ petition filed by the Hyderabad Cricket Association (HCA) questioning proceeding before a three-man Arbitration Commission
Hyderabad: The vacation Bench of the High Court at Hyderabad comprising Justice C Praveen Kumar and Justice Challa Kodandaram on Wednesday refused to take on file a writ petition filed by the Hyderabad Cricket Association (HCA) questioning proceeding before a three-man Arbitration Commission. The HCA is before the Commission of Justice Eshwar Prasad, Justice Motilal B Naik and Raviinder Vikram.
The dispute is at the instance of Vishaka Asbestos, a company, which have multiple commercial claims against the HCA. It was contended by it that the agreement was unilaterally terminated by the HCA without the authority of law. The claimant then moved the proceedings for the Arbitral resolution of the dispute. The Bench pointed out that prima facie it was not permissible to maintain a writ plea against arbitration proceedings. The Bench, however, directed that the matter be listed after the Sankranti vacation.
