Live
- TTD closes Akasaganga, Papavinasam roads
- High costs, limited results: Drone mist-spraying pilot project faces setback
- Poster war on as parties compete for voter attention
- Many dams, tanks filled as rains batter Tirupati dist
- Mayawati, Akhilesh condemn damage to Constitution replica
- Mann slams Centre over ‘one nation, one election’
- Techie suicide case: Mother-in-law flees Jaunpur home
- State government to Supreme Court: New guidelines on how to apply anti-gangster law in UP
- CM Chandrababu to unveil Vision 2047 document today in Vijayawada, traffic restrictions imposed
- State-level LIMES-2k24 inaugurated
Rushikonda project: Apex court admits SLP filed by AP government challenging NGT order
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Thursday took up a special leave petition filed by the AP government challenging the National Green Tribunal order which stayed the constructions at Rushikonda Beach Resort project.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday took up a special leave petition filed by the AP government challenging the National Green Tribunal order which stayed the constructions at Rushikonda Beach Resort project.
The SLP brought to the notice of the court that the NGT had issued an ex-parte order unilaterally without hearing the State government's version. The Supreme Court bench led by Justice Chandrachud, which admitted the petition, directed the registry to list the case for hearing on Monday.
On May 11, the National Green Tribunal (NGT), acting on a petition filed by rebel YSR Congress party MP K Raghu Ramakrishna Raju, ordered an interim stay on the construction works of the proposed tourism project on Rushikonda Hill abutting the beach in Visakhapatnam.
The NGT's Principal Bench in New Delhi also constituted a joint committee to look into the environmental viability of the project and whether Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) clearances should be revisited.
"No further construction shall be undertaken till the next date of hearing," the NGT said, while directing the APTDC and Ministry of Environment to file their counter. The matter had been listed for July 11. The NGT's order came even as an earlier committee it had appointed said there were no violations. This committee with members from the Central and State Pollution Control Boards, State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority and Vizag District Collector, reported that the construction was for the tourism project for which Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) clearance was granted.
Raju, however, alleged that the construction work was being carried out in gross violation of environmental norms.
He also alleged that the master plan notified by the Urban Development Department, too, was violated. The petitioner termed the area environmentally sensitive, and said the State should protect it as per its Constitutional mandate.
