Live
- Bhubaneswar: BJP, BJD allege violation of MCC
- Is Sai Pallavi Demanding a Massive Paycheck for her Bollywood Debut Opposite Ranbir Kapoor?
- LS election is a fight between two ideologies: Rahul Gandhi
- Congress trying to snatch Belgaum from BJP
- Kishan Reddy to present development report card today
- Vishweshwar Reddy opposes govt sale of endowment lands
- Will Ram Charan's ‘Game Changer’ Clash with Rajinikanth and Jr NTR in October?
- Bhubaneswar: Naveen to contest from Hinjili, Kantabanji
- Visakhapatnam: ‘YSRCP is certain to continue in power’
- Ranveer Singh Wows Guests with Spectacular Dance at Aishwarya Shankar's Nuptials
Rushikonda project: Apex court admits SLP filed by AP government challenging NGT order
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Thursday took up a special leave petition filed by the AP government challenging the National Green Tribunal order which stayed the constructions at Rushikonda Beach Resort project.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday took up a special leave petition filed by the AP government challenging the National Green Tribunal order which stayed the constructions at Rushikonda Beach Resort project.
The SLP brought to the notice of the court that the NGT had issued an ex-parte order unilaterally without hearing the State government's version. The Supreme Court bench led by Justice Chandrachud, which admitted the petition, directed the registry to list the case for hearing on Monday.
On May 11, the National Green Tribunal (NGT), acting on a petition filed by rebel YSR Congress party MP K Raghu Ramakrishna Raju, ordered an interim stay on the construction works of the proposed tourism project on Rushikonda Hill abutting the beach in Visakhapatnam.
The NGT's Principal Bench in New Delhi also constituted a joint committee to look into the environmental viability of the project and whether Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) clearances should be revisited.
"No further construction shall be undertaken till the next date of hearing," the NGT said, while directing the APTDC and Ministry of Environment to file their counter. The matter had been listed for July 11. The NGT's order came even as an earlier committee it had appointed said there were no violations. This committee with members from the Central and State Pollution Control Boards, State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority and Vizag District Collector, reported that the construction was for the tourism project for which Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) clearance was granted.
Raju, however, alleged that the construction work was being carried out in gross violation of environmental norms.
He also alleged that the master plan notified by the Urban Development Department, too, was violated. The petitioner termed the area environmentally sensitive, and said the State should protect it as per its Constitutional mandate.
