Live
- Prakasam police rescues kidnapped toddler within hours
- Time to get rid of Sattavad and Parivarvad politics
- Extend neither spl nor ill treatment
- Must-Watch OTT Originals in 2024: The Year’s Best Shows and Movies
- 40 Indian startups secure over $787 mn in a week
- India now formidable force on chess board
- Raghavendra Mutt pontiff visits Tirumala
- Whistleblower of OpenAI found dead in US apartment
- Trump’s US-first policy & India’s strategic latitude
- Chandrababu pays tribute to Potti Sriramulu and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
Delhi HC grants more time to Centre to reply to PIL against 'INDIA' use
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday granted more time to the Central government to respond to a PIL seeking direction to stop the opposition parties from using acronym INDIA (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance) for their bloc.
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Tuesday granted more time to the Central government to respond to a PIL seeking direction to stop the opposition parties from using acronym INDIA (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance) for their bloc.
The Election Commission (EC), in its counter-affidavit filed has said that it cannot regulate political alliances under the Representation of People Act.
Hence, the court noted that only the EC has filed a response and some of the political parties named in the proceedings have not been served notice yet. It also granted time to the political parties to state their stand.
Counsel for the petitioner, businessman Girish Bharadwaj said that the matter required to be dealt with urgently, as the parties were using “the name of the country” and the national flag.
The writ petition, contends that to date, the poll panel has not taken any action on the representation given by him to prevent the respondent political parties to use the acronym INDIA. It is his case that the acronym has been used only to take undue advantages in the upcoming general elections in 2024.
In its reply, the EC, cited a decision of the Kerala High Court that there is no statutory provision mandating the constitutional body to regulate the functioning of political alliances, but said its reply should not be seen as an expression of its opinion on the legality of use of the acronym by the political parties involved.
In August, the high court had issued notice to the Central government in Bharadwaj’s PIL.
A division bench headed by Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and comprising Justice Amit Mahajan had sought response from the Central government, the EC, and 26 political parties. The court had remarked that this has case to be heard.
"It requires hearing," it had said.
"…practice of using the acronym I.N.D.I.A. (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance)/INDIA of respondent political parties are only to attract and gain sympathy and votes of the innocent citizen and to use as a tool for political benefit and also to give a nudge or a spark which may lead to political hatred which eventually will lead to political violence,” the PIL claims.
Citing alleged violation of Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950, and relevant Rules, Bharadwaj has said that the acronym being the essential part of the national emblem cannot be used for any professional, commercial purpose, and political purpose.
"…the selfish act of these political parties may adversely affect the peaceful, transparent and fair casting of votes during the upcoming general election of 2024 which may expose the citizens to unwarranted violence and also affect the law and order of the country,” the plea reads.
