Live
- Chanchalguda Jail Officials Say They Haven't Received Bail Papers Yet, Allu Arjun May Stay in Jail Tonight
- BJP leaders present evidence of illegal voters in Delhi, urge EC for swift action
- Exams will not be cancelled: BPSC chairman
- Nagesh Trophy: Karnataka, T.N win in Group A; Bihar, Rajasthan triumph in Group B
- YS Jagan condemns the arrest of Allu Arjun
- Economic and digital corridors to maritime connectivity, India and Italy building vision for future, says Italian Ambassador
- SMAT 2024: Patidar's heroics guide Madhya Pradesh to final after 13 years
- CCPA issues notices to 17 entities for violating direct selling rules
- Mamata expresses satisfaction over speedy conviction in minor girl rape-murder case
- Transparent Survey Process for Indiramma Housing Scheme Directed by District Collector
Orders on appointment of judicial officers reserved
The two-judge PIL Bench of the High Court at Hyderabad comprising of acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale and Justice S V Bhatt on Monday while reserving orders proposed to continue the ongoing process of conducting written examination and interview process of the successful candidates appearing for subordinate judicial officer examination.
The two-judge PIL Bench of the High Court at Hyderabad comprising of acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale and Justice S V Bhatt on Monday while reserving orders proposed to continue the ongoing process of conducting written examination and interview process of the successful candidates appearing for subordinate judicial officer examination.
However, the Hon'ble Court said that the appointment will not be done until further orders. The counsel for the petitioners and the Advocate General for the State of Telangana opposed the said option proposed by the Hon'ble Court. They pointed out that the Rules with regard to these examinations are framed by the State Government and since the ongoing examinations were contrary to the said rules it could be given judicial acceptance.
The PIL Bench was dealing with three writ petition filed challenging the action the authorities in not bifurcating the subordinate judicial officers and judicial employees of the erstwhile state of Andhra Pradesh and not distributing subordinate Judicial Officers and other employees to the State of Telangana and to the State of Andhra Pradesh.
The petitioners questioned the notifications issued in February 2014 and 2015 as null and void, arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 233 and 234 of Constitution of India .
